Velarion · Company Intelligence
Compensation Brief
Fiscal year 2021 · Filings through 2022-05-12

Autoscope Technologies (AATC)

Fiscal year 2021 executive and director compensation, incentive-plan design, equity activity, and governance — every figure in this brief is traceable to its exact location in the company’s SEC filing — the document, the section, the page, and the table, linked directly.

$305,148
Chad Stelzig total, FY2021
Former President and Chief Executive Officerhighest-paid officer; CEO Andrew Berger: $0
CEO (Andrew Berger) pay percentile vs peers
CEO-to-median pay ratio
95.28%
Say-on-pay support, latest vote
Companies that benchmark against AATC
1 company names AATC as a compensation peer

Each company listed discloses AATC in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named AATC in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.

01

Summary Compensation Table — fiscal year 2021

Named executive officerSalaryBonusStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentivePension / NQDCAll otherTotal
Chad Stelzig$275,000$0$18,174$0$0$0$11,973$305,148
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
Frank Hallowell238,333018,31600011,096267,745
Chief Financial Officer
Andrew Berger00000000
Chief Executive Officer

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Named executive officerFY2021 totalFY2020 totalFY2019 totalΔ FY20202021
Chad Stelzig$305,148
Frank Hallowell267,745
Andrew Berger0

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

02

Equity transactions since the proxy statement was filed

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

03

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2021

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
Chad StelzigOTHER$18,174
Frank HallowellOTHER18,316
03b

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Grant-level vehicle detail not disclosed.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

04

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2021

ExecutiveAwardShares unvestedExercise priceMarket value unvested
Chad StelzigRSU4,225$26,575
Chad StelzigOption07.1
Chad StelzigOption04.22
Frank HallowellRSU3,50622,053
Chad StelzigOption05
05

Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The primary objective of our various compensation programs is to attract, motivate and retain key executives and align their compensation with our overall performance. Autoscope's Compensation Committee believes that incentive, performance based compensation can be a key factor in motivating executive performance to maximize shareholder value and align executive performance with our corporate objectives and shareholder interests.

CEO STI target (% of salary)50%
CEO LTI target (% of salary)
Independent consultantSemler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC
Clawback policytrue
Anti-hedgingtrue
Anti-pledgingTrue
06

Say-on-pay — recent advisory votes

Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20222022-05-102,741,11792,17443,46695.28%Passed
20212021-05-042,951,45646,0367,97298.2%Passed
20192019-05-081,974,91392,030300,83583.41%Passed
20182018-05-012,724,54834,868242,93490.75%Passed
20172017-05-112,933,88641,61417,18498.04%Passed
20162016-05-102,406,687638,41655,96777.61%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company's computation
20222022-05-1095.28%a
20212021-05-0498.2%b
20192019-05-0883.41%c

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “If you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “If you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “If you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

08

Director compensation — fiscal year 2021

DirectorCash feesStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveAll otherTotal
Andrew T. BergerEmployee director · Board Chair$58,587$25,004$0$0$83,591
James W. BrackeIndependent · Audit (Chair) · Compensation · Nominating/Governance50,00025,00400075,004
Geoffrey C. DavisIndependent · Compensation (Chair) · Audit · Nominating/Governance39,12025,00400064,124
Joseph P. DalyIndependent · Lead Independent Director · Nominating/Governance (Chair) · Audit · Compensation26,78325,00400051,787
Brian J. VanDerBoschIndependent · Audit · Compensation · Newly elected19,08916,40700035,496
Ezekiel J. KruglickIndependent · Newly elected8,2888,31000016,598
09

Board fee structure and ownership guideline

Annual cash retainer$25,000
Annual equity retainer$25,000
Per board meeting fee
Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov)10,000 / 7,000 / 5,000
Stock ownership guideline
09b

Total cost of the board

ComponentFY2021
Cash retainers and fees$201,867
Equity awards (grant-date value)$124,733
All other compensation$0
Total cost of the board$326,600

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

10b

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
1Autoscope Technologies2021Andrew Berger$0$0$0$0$0

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

11

Source register

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

#SupportsDocumentFiledAccessionLocation in document
1Section 01, Chad StelzigDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 305,148. Filing ↗
2Section 01, Frank HallowellDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 267,745. Filing ↗
3Section 01, Andrew BergerDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 0. Filing ↗
4Section 03, Chad Stelzig OTHERDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” · grants of plan-based awards table. Filing ↗machine: t31 · r1 · c8 · span 322688–322694
5Section 03, Frank Hallowell OTHERDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” · grants of plan-based awards table. Filing ↗machine: t31 · r4 · c8 · span 341229–341235
6Section 08, Andrew T. BergerDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 83,591. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r2 · c9 · span 261298–261304
7Section 08, James W. BrackeDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 75,004. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r1 · c9 · span 259274–259280
8Section 08, Geoffrey C. DavisDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 64,124. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r4 · c9 · span 265049–265055
9Section 08, Joseph P. DalyDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 51,787. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r5 · c9 · span 266046–266052
10Section 08, Brian J. VanDerBoschDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 35,496. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r6 · c9 · span 266900–266906
11Section 08, Ezekiel J. KruglickDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 16,598. Filing ↗machine: t24 · r7 · c9 · span 267752–267758
12Section 06, 2022 voteForm 8-K2022-05-120000897101-22-000506Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 95.28%. Filing ↗
13Section 06, 2021 voteForm 8-K2021-05-050000897101-21-000358Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 98.2%. Filing ↗
14Section 06, 2019 voteForm 8-K2019-05-100000897101-19-000471Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 83.41% (votes for as printed: 2,192,019). Filing ↗machine: span 41076–42841
15Section 09b board cost (computed)ComputedcomputedCash 201,867 + equity 124,733 + all other 0 = 326,600, summed across the director compensation table rows.machine: formula: Σ = 326,600
16Autoscope Technologies (subject), Section 10b CEO totalDEF 14A2022-03-220000897101-22-000300CEO total compensation as printed in Autoscope Technologies's own proxy. As printed: 0. Filing ↗