The current picture

CIEN — The Refresh

Ciena Corp  ·  Tech — Hardware  ·  what the filings show today, ahead of the next annual disclosure
Current-year awards
$2,999,971
6,517 units, Jun 22, 2026 — in no annual table yet
Share price
$377.05
52 weeks to Jul 31, 2026: $84.41 – $637.51
Open-market sales
$83,358,167
70 lines · 69 indicated under a Rule 10b5-1 plan
Say-on-pay, this window
95.5%
meeting Mar 26, 2026

Purpose of Report

Ciena Corp's most recent annual compensation disclosure covers fiscal 2025, which closed on Oct 31, 2025. This document reports the compensation actions taken since that date — awards granted, shares delivered, holdings moved, roster changed — through Jul 15, 2026, the date of the latest action filed, and closes the interval between the two.

Epoch 1 — the annual disclosure
Fiscal 2025, published Feb 12, 2026
Salary, incentive payouts, prior awards, unvested balances at fiscal year-end, the peer group, and the stated pay design. Cash figures in this document come from here and are labeled as such throughout.
Epoch 2 — current filings
Actions through Jul 15, 2026 · filed through Jul 17, 2026
Awards granted, shares delivered, tax withheld, shares sold, and running share balances — each an individually filed document. Equity figures in this document come from here.

Contents

2What changed since the annual disclosure
3Current-year awards — not yet in any annual table
4Awards against the stated pay philosophy
5Estimated current-year target total direct compensation
6Peer refresh — who has granted, and what
7The year on one timeline
8Executive equity activity year to date
9Directors
10Method, coverage, and what we do not know
APer-executive statements
BRegister conventions and the aggregated register
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Annual figures from CIEN's most recent annual compensation disclosure for fiscal 2025. Share prices are daily closes from an independent market source.
1
The deltas

What changed since the annual disclosure

Each headline below is traceable to a page in this document.
The year, bottom-lined
$2,999,971 of long-term awards has already been granted this year, and none of it will appear in an annual compensation table until the spring-2026 disclosure. Shareholders supported the program at 95.5%.

What to watch: the 36.0% of the long-term program that settles on performance. It is not reported at grant, so every figure here covers the portion that is filed.
The Velarion Read
$2,999,971 of long-term awards went out on Jun 22, 2026 to 1 officer. The 36.0% of the program delivered in performance units is not visible in any filing until it is earned, so the figure understates the year. Insiders sold $83,358,167 across 70 transactions. Gary B. Smith accounts for $40,804,392 of that, 49.0% of the total. None of this appears in an annual compensation table before the spring-2026 disclosure.
$2,999,971 of long-term awards has been granted this year and appears in no annual table
On Jun 22, 2026, 1 officer received 6,517 units, valued at that day's close of $460.33. The most recent annual disclosure covers fiscal 2025 and predates all of it. These awards first reach a Summary Compensation Table in the spring-2026 cycle.
Detail on page 3
Part of of the stated long-term program is not visible in any filing at grant
The stated design allocates 36.0% of long-term value to performance share units. Performance units are contingent and are not reported at grant, so the $2,999,971 above represents the 64.0% of the program that is filed. Any comparison that treats filed awards as the whole program understates this company — and understates it unevenly against peers who do file their performance units.
Method and the peer consequence on pages 4 and 6
The largest sale not indicated as made under a trading plan — 8,554 shares, $1,921,742
Thomas Michael Nevens (non-employee director) sold 8,554 shares on Dec 15, 2025. On the filings themselves, 69 of the 70 sale lines are indicated as made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. That insider's filed share balance moved from 17,976 before Dec 15, 2025 to 10,027 on Mar 26, 2026, a change of -44.2%.
Full activity on page 8
The roster the filings show is not the roster the annual tables show
4 officers file transactions who are not among the 5 named executives in the fiscal 2025 tables.
Roster detail on pages 3 and 8
Shareholders supported the pay program at 95.5%
At the meeting of Mar 26, 2026, 114,515,974 shares voted for and 5,360,579 against. The percentage is shares for as a share of for-plus-against, computed from the vote filing; abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded. The vote has run 90.7% → 90.1% → 94.6% → 95.5% across the last 4 years on record, so this year is 0.9 percentage points above the year before it and 0.0 percentage points below the highest of them. All $2,999,971 of the awards on page 3 was granted after this vote, beginning 88 days later. The vote itself addressed the preceding year's program.
Chronology on page 7
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed.
2
Current-year awards

Current-year awards — Jun 22, 2026 to Jun 22, 2026

Each award valued at the closing price on its own award date.
Every current-year award was made on Jun 22, 2026 at $460.33 a share — $2,999,971 across 1 officer. The 36.0% of the program delivered in performance units is not reported at grant, so what is shown here is the visible portion. Separately, shares from earlier awards were delivered to 7 named executives at exactly the amounts the last disclosure said were outstanding.
Granted after the close of fiscal 2025, so they appear in no compensation table until the spring-2026 disclosure. A later CD&A may mention a grant in narrative, but the tables that carry the numbers are a year out. Unit counts are as filed; values are that count at the closing price on its own award date.

Awards by officer

OfficerAward dateShare-settled
units
Total unitsPrice per unit
at that date
ValueInstruments, as filed
Grant Hoffman
SVP Chief Supply Chain Officer · not in the fiscal 2025 tables
Jun 22, 20266,5176,517$460.33$2,999,9716,517 Common Stock
Total — 1 awards to 1 officer1 dates6,5176,517$2,999,971
Shaded rows are named executives in the fiscal 2025 tables. Unshaded rows are officers who file transactions but do not appear in those tables — their current awards are visible here and nowhere else until the next annual disclosure.

Valuation basis

Closing price, Jun 22, 2026
$460.33
Settlement form
Share-settled: the award delivers shares on vesting. Cash-settled: the award pays cash equal to the value of the underlying shares. The settlement form is the one stated in the company's own filing.
Share-settled awards
units × closing price. No modeling — for full-value share awards this is the grant-date fair value construction.

Award date in its trailing 52-week range

Where the share price sat on the award date, against its own preceding year.
low $73.55 award date $460.33 — 68.6% of range high $637.51
Awards were valued above at $460.33, the close on the award date. At $377.05 on Jul 31, 2026 the shares are 18.1% below that price. The range position is stated for completeness. Award timing follows the company's regular December cycle rather than the share price: annual awards are dated Dec 13, 2022, Dec 12, 2023, Dec 17, 2024, Jun 22, 2026 in the years we can observe (the fiscal 2025 grant table is absent from our record, so that year is not among them). Range is the trailing 52 weeks to the award date from daily highs and lows (251 trading days).

Shares delivered on earlier awards — Dec 16, 2025

Shares from awards granted in earlier years, delivered this year. For 7 of 12 named executives the quantity equals, to the share, a tranche the fiscal 2025 disclosure reported as still unvested.
OfficerDelivery dateShares delivered Value at delivery date
Gary B. SmithDec 16, 2025242,552 (3 lines)$50,897,112
Jason PhippsDec 16, 202551,214 (3 lines)$10,746,746
David RothensteinDec 16, 202540,722 (3 lines)$8,545,104
Joseph CumelloDec 16, 202529,411 (3 lines)$6,171,604
Dino DiPernaDec 16, 202521,707 (2 lines)$4,554,997
Brodie GageDec 16, 202519,959 (2 lines)$4,188,197
Sheela KosarajuDec 16, 202519,721 (2 lines)$4,138,255
Marc GraffDec 16, 20259,293$1,950,043

Award terms, from the filings' own footnotes

Common Stock
Shares reported include unvested Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). (this note appears on 9 of the 10 award transactions)
Restricted stock units (RSUs) vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. (this note appears on 9 of the 10 award transactions)
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Closing prices are daily closes from an independent market source, reconciled against prices stated on the filings themselves — see page 10.
3
Said versus did

Awards against the stated pay philosophy

What the company said it intended to grant, and what the filings show it granted.
Every award filed this year is share-settled, so there is no delivered split to set against the stated design. Both are set out below; where the stated design divides value between vehicles that settle the same way, that division is not observable in a transaction filing.

What was stated — fiscal 2025 disclosure

VehicleStated share
of long-term value
Visible at grant?
RSU40%appears in the filings
PSU36%contingent — not reported at grant
MSU24%appears in the filings
Read from the fiscal 2025 annual disclosure. Our reading of that document carries a low confidence label, which is disclosed here rather than suppressed; the comparison below is therefore presented as directional.

What was filed — Jun 22, 2026

SleeveUnitsShare of filed award
Share-settled6,517 100.0%
Cash-settled0 0.0%
Filed total6,517100.0%
Every filed award is share-settled, so there is no split to compare — the stated design and the filed awards are both above.
The unverifiable half. 36.0% of stated long-term value is delivered in performance share units, which are not reported at grant. No filing confirms that half was granted, at what target, or on what metrics, and this document does not assume it was — every filed figure covers the 64.0% that is observable.
This company's filed awards are entirely share-settled. A delivered-mix comparison needs two sleeves to compare, so none is made here — the stated design and the filed awards are shown above and the reader can see both.

Short-term incentive — the stated design

Chief executive target
150.0% of salary (fiscal 2025 disclosure)
Basis
Formulaic against disclosed metrics, with committee discretion applied on top in the disclosed year — the annual document states a qualitative uplift was awarded above the formulaic outcome.
The current year's short-term outcome is not yet determinable: it is measured over the full year and disclosed next spring. Page 5 uses the stated target, never an assumed payout.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Stated design from the fiscal 2025 annual compensation disclosure.
4
Estimated target TDC

Estimated current-year target total direct compensation

Latest salary, stated target bonus, and this year’s long-term award.
This is an estimate of opportunity, not of what will be earned; the performance half depends on cycles that have not run.

Build-up

ExecutiveSalary
fiscal 2025
Short-term
target
Long-term —
as filed
Total on
filed awards
Long-term —
whole program
Total —
whole program
Fiscal 2025
actual, disclosed
Gary Smith
President and CEO
$1,075,000$1,612,500no award filed in this windowexcludes filed awardno award filedexcludes filed award$18,530,396
Marc Graff
SVP and CFO
$165,000not disclosed individuallyno award filed in this windowexcludes short-term target and filed awardno award filedexcludes short-term target and filed award$12,997,299
Jason Phipps
SVP, Global Customer Engagement
$579,450no individual target in the programno award filed in this windowexcludes short-term target and filed awardno award filedexcludes short-term target and filed award$5,242,937
David Rothenstein
SVP, Chief Strategy Officer and Secretary
$573,900no individual target in the programno award filed in this windowexcludes short-term target and filed awardno award filedexcludes short-term target and filed award$4,231,335
Dino DiPerna
SVP, Global R&D
$474,662no individual target in the programno award filed in this windowexcludes short-term target and filed awardno award filedexcludes short-term target and filed award$3,797,684
James Moylan, Jr.
SVP and CFO (former)
$520,793no individual target in the programstated as an award, not as an individual targetexcludes short-term target and filed awardno award filedexcludes short-term target and filed award$1,427,067
Why a short-term target appears for the chief executive only. The stated design discloses one target percentage — the chief executive's — and that is the figure captured. This company pays a short-term incentive to every named executive under the same formula plan, and the amounts each received last year are inside the disclosed total in the final column; what is not available here is each officer's own target. Where it is absent the totals say so rather than presenting a smaller number as if it were complete.
How the whole-program columns are computed: filed award / 0.64, because the stated design says the filed vehicles are 64.0% of long-term value.
Salary and the fiscal 2025 actual are as disclosed. Short-term target is the disclosed target percentage applied to disclosed salary, and is shown only where that percentage is disclosed for the individual — it is not imputed from another executive's target. Long-term as filed is page 3's value. Rows without a disclosed individual target show a partial total rather than a total built on an assumption.

Assumptions - the whole-program column

What it assumes
that the stated 64.0% / 36.0% split between filed and contingent long-term vehicles held for this year's award.
The arithmetic
filed long-term value / 0.64 — nothing else.
What it rests on
one reading of one annual document, carrying a low confidence label. If the split moved this year, this column moves with it and the filed column does not.
What would confirm it
the spring-2026 disclosure. This estimate is made roughly a year ahead of it and is intended to be graded against it.

The chief executive, in context

Long-term, as filed this year — ordinary awards
pending — not resolved to an ordinary award event
Long-term, implied full program
pending
Long-term target stated for fiscal 2025
$12,500,015
Total target stated for fiscal 2025
$15,250,015
Salary, short-term target and long-term target as we read them sum to $15,187,515, $62,500 below the total the company states. The company's figure is the one shown; the difference is a component of its stated target we do not separately hold, and it is named here rather than averaged away.
Fiscal 2025 actual, disclosed
$18,530,396
The stated fiscal 2025 long-term target and the filed current-year award are measured on different bases — one is a target value set by the committee, the other is a unit count multiplied by a market close — and they are placed side by side rather than differenced for that reason.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Cash components from the fiscal 2025 annual compensation disclosure.
5
Peer refresh

Peer refresh — who has granted, and what

The company's own disclosed comparison group, re-read against this year's filings.
The Velarion Read
16 of the 18 companies in this comparison group have already granted this cycle, so a mid-year read is possible.

Window status, company by company

16 of 18 granted in the current cycle; the rest are timing, not absence. The columns have two different subjects. Window status and the busiest date describe any insider at that company; the award event, units and value describe that company's chief executive alone. A company can therefore read “granted this cycle” beside “none yet” without contradiction — its insiders have received awards and its chief executive has not, which is itself the fact worth seeing.
CompanyWindow status —
any insider
Busiest award date,
all insiders
Chief executive Largest filed award
event — the CEO only
Units —
the CEO only
Value at that
day's close
Excluded — stated
deliveries of
earlier awards
Coverage
through
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
granted this cycleFeb 19, 2026
4 award dates
Tom LeightonMar 2, 202674,252$7,249,9653 lines
44,380 units
Jul 15, 2026
CALX
Calix
granted this cycleMay 14, 2026
6 award dates
Michael WeeningFeb 12, 2026217,500$11,314,350noneJul 28, 2026
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
granted this cycleMar 18, 2026
4 award dates
Anirudh DevganMar 18, 2026146,849$42,533,3441 line
43,318 units
Jul 23, 2026
COHR
Coherent Corp
granted this cycleFeb 11, 2026
1 award dates
James R. Andersonnone yetnone yetlast award Aug 28, 2025noneJul 24, 2026
EXTR
Extreme Networks
granted this cycleJan 5, 2026
2 award dates
Edward Meyercordnone yetnone yetlast award Aug 15, 2025noneJul 2, 2026
FFIV
F5 Networks
granted this cycleMar 12, 2026
3 award dates
François Locoh-Donounone yetnone yetno award program for this executive — 63 other transactions filednoneJul 2, 2026
JNPR
Juniper Networks
no longer an independent filerwindow pendingRami Rahimnone yetnone yetwindow pendingnone
KEYS
Keysight Technologies
granted this cycleMar 20, 2026
2 award dates
Satish Dhanasekarannone yetnone yetno award program for this executive — 14 other transactions filednoneJul 8, 2026
LITE
Lumentum
granted this cycleJul 15, 2026
7 award dates
Michael Hurlstonnone yetnone yetlast award Aug 19, 2025noneJul 16, 2026
LOGI
Logitech
granted this cycleApr 15, 2026
3 award dates
Johanna FaberJan 30, 2026100$8,584noneMay 19, 2026
MSI
Motorola Solutions
granted this cycleMar 12, 2026
6 award dates
Gregory BrownFeb 25, 202643,554$20,528,3071 line
94,246 units
Jul 7, 2026
NTAP
NetApp
granted this cycleMay 14, 2026
3 award dates
George KurianJul 1, 202629,259$4,575,5222 lines
127,087 units
Jul 14, 2026
NTNX
Nutanix
window pendingwindow pendingRajiv Ramaswaminone yetnone yetno award program for this executive — 61 other transactions filednoneJun 17, 2026
SANM
Sanmina
granted this cycleMar 16, 2026
1 award dates
Jure Solanone yetnone yetno award program for this executive — 5 other transactions filednoneJun 1, 2026
SNPS
Synopsys
granted this cycleApr 16, 2026
3 award dates
Sassine Ghazinone yetnone yetno award program for this executive — 34 other transactions filednoneJun 16, 2026
VISN
CommScope
granted this cycleJan 8, 2026
4 award dates
Charles TreadwayJan 8, 2026697,272$12,397,4961 line
18,171 units
Jun 3, 2026
VSAT
ViaSat
granted this cycleJun 7, 2026
2 award dates
Mark DankbergJun 7, 2026103,621$6,961,259noneJul 22, 2026
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
granted this cycleFeb 3, 2026
4 award dates
William BurnsMar 3, 202620,990$4,730,7262 lines
25,060 units
May 28, 2026
How to read the two date columns, because they answer different questions. Busiest award date is the date carrying the most award-coded lines across all of that company's insiders this year. It is a density observation, not a determination that the annual long-term grant happened then — at one company here the busiest date falls in July while its chief executive's own award was filed in February, and both facts are shown rather than reconciled into one. Largest filed award event is the chief executive's own most-populated award date, after deliveries of earlier awards are removed.

Window status is inferred from a single year. “Granted this cycle” means at least one award-coded line dated in 2026 that is neither a delivery of an earlier award nor a merger conversion. Our coverage of these companies is predominantly 2026 alone, and one year of grant dates cannot distinguish a recurring annual window from a coincidence. The column therefore records that a company has granted, never a claim about when it usually grants — and no company is recorded as not granting on the strength of a window our coverage may simply not reach.

How these values are built, and what they are not

Each value is one filed award event, priced at that day's close. For each chief executive: take their award-coded lines this year, remove any line that delivers an award granted in an earlier year, and any multi-year price-hurdle grant, group what remains into same-day events, and value the largest. A delivery is identified on the filing's own evidence, never on its size: the footnote naming an earlier award year, or a quantity the company's last annual disclosure already reported as outstanding and unvested for that person, or a date whose other award lines are confirmed deliveries. Each excluded line is counted in its own column with the reason, rather than quietly dropped. The largest is 70,060 units at NTAP on May 14, 2026, excluded because its own footnote says it was “granted on July 13, 2023” — 2.39× that chief executive's largest remaining award-coded cluster this year.

The same operator runs on both sides of the comparison. This company's award value on this page is produced by the identical procedure applied to the identical source — filed award-coded lines, the same delivery exclusion, the same same-day grouping, the same closing-price valuation. Nothing on the subject side is computed from the annual disclosure, from a survey, or from a different vintage of data. A comparison whose two sides are built differently measures the difference in method as much as the difference in pay, which is why the method is stated here rather than only for the peers.
What this number is not. It is the largest filed award event, not a determination that this was the company's annual long-term grant — that would need each company's own program, which this document does not assert. Three consequences a reader should carry:

1. Filing practice for performance units is not uniform. Some companies here file performance share units at grant with target quantities and a per-unit value on the face of the filing; where a company does not, its unfiled performance units are invisible at grant. A company that files its performance units shows a larger figure than one that does not, at identical total pay.

2. Where something was excluded, the row shows what and how much. 6 of these companies had a prior-year delivery or a multi-year price-hurdle grant removed before the remaining award was valued — the same two removals made to this company's own figure. Excluded quantities are printed in the table's own columns rather than netted away, so a reader can put any of them back.

3. Where the choice is genuinely undetermined, the number is withheld rather than guessed — two comparable award events on different dates with nothing in the footnotes to distinguish between them. No company in this group met that condition this cycle, so the rule cost nothing here — it is stated because it is what would happen if one did.

Where this company sits

Comparable population
9 companies — those that granted and whose chief executive is resolvable to the filings, each valued by the procedure described above: the same removals, the same grouping, the same closing-price valuation applied to this company
Range across those 9
$8,584 – $42,533,344
Median
$7,249,965
This company
pending
Carried with an exclusion
6 companies had a delivery or a multi-year grant removed before valuation
The median is a median of filed award events, not of total long-term pay, and it inherits every caveat above — most importantly that this company's performance units are not always filed at grant, and practice differs across this group. Read it as: on the portion that reaches a filing, this is where the company sits. The award windows in this group run from January to July, which is what makes a mid-year comparison possible for it at all.

Comparison-group integrity

Disclosed comparison companies
18
Unresolvable entries
0
No longer independent filers
1 — companies that left public markets since the group was set
Prior-award deliveries removed
6 companies' chief executives have at least one award-coded line that delivers an award granted in an earlier year — on the footnote, on a quantity their own last disclosure reported as outstanding and unvested, or on the other lines filed the same day. Those lines are excluded and counted in the table's own column, which is why that column shows 10 lines across those 6 companies.
A comparison group set at the last annual disclosure ages. Naming which members have stopped filing, and which we cannot see far enough forward on, is part of reporting the group honestly — a group is only as current as its least current member.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Comparison group as disclosed by the company for fiscal 2025. Award-date closes from an independent market source, per company.
6
One timeline

The year on one timeline

Company events, awards, the shareholder vote and insider activity on a single chronology.
The Velarion Read
All $2,999,971 of this year's awards was granted after shareholders voted on pay, beginning 88 days later. The sequence is set out here in the order it happened, each line with its source.
Company events
Awards
delivery of earlier awards
award · 6,517 units
The vote
say-on-pay 95.5%
Insider sales
sale 6,800
sale 6,800
sale 5,093
sale 6,800
sale 11,604
sale 6,800
sale 1,748
sale 83,552
sale 2,500
sale 23,547
sale 29,812
sale 2,952
sale 5,452
sale 2,952
sale 5,452
sale 5,000
sale 1,773
sale 26,978
sale 9,481
sale 2,952
sale 6,652
sale 2,952
sale 6,652
sale 126
sale 1,586
sale 7,720
sale 7,434
Nov
Dec
Jan 2026
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug

Events in the window, with sources

No company events are carried for this filer. An event appears on this page only with a working cited source, and none has been verified for this company in this window. That is a statement about this document's event record and not about the company's year: the awards, the vote and the insider activity on the chronology above are complete and come from the filings themselves.
#DateCategoryEvent Source and citation
Each event carries the source it was verified against, so it can be re-found independently.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Company events from the company's own published disclosures.
7
Activity year to date

Executive equity activity year to date

Filed share balances, awards, deliveries, withholding and sales — Nov 3, 2025 to Jul 15, 2026.
The Velarion Read
Insiders sold $83,358,167 this year. 97.7% of that value, and 98.6% of the 70 sale lines, was on transactions marked as made under a trading plan. Gary B. Smith is the largest seller at $40,804,392, 49.0% of the year's total; the seller summary below is ranked by value. The largest reduction in filed holdings across every insider filing balances this year is Thomas Michael Nevens, a director, at -44.2% — 17,976 direct holdings before the window against 10,027 at the latest filing.

Named executives — fiscal 2025 tables

ExecutiveUnvested at
fiscal 2025 close
Shares delivered on
earlier awards
Withheld
for tax
SoldShare balance,
before the window
Share balance,
latest filed
ChangeLatest balance
at market
Gary B. Smith
President, CEO
461,459242,552−116,719−149,169275,270
before Nov 3, 2025
251,934
Jul 15, 2026
-8.5%$94,991,715
Marc Graff
SVP & Chief Financial Officer
118,3129,293−398−252118,312
before Dec 16, 2025
126,955
Jul 1, 2026
7.3%$47,868,383
Jason Phipps
SVP Global Sales and Marketing
106,48151,214−23,050−46,02680,244
before Dec 16, 2025
62,382
Jul 1, 2026
-22.3%$23,521,133
David Rothenstein
SVP and Chief Strategy Officer
89,19940,722−21,181−22,500185,690
before Nov 17, 2025
182,731
Jul 15, 2026
-1.6%$68,898,724
Dino DiPerna
SVP Global R&D
61,17921,707−11,465−11,14740,529
before Nov 17, 2025
39,624
Jul 15, 2026
-2.2%$14,940,229

Officers who file but are not in the fiscal 2025 tables

OfficerShares awarded
into the balance
Shares delivered on
earlier awards
Withheld
for tax
SoldShare balance,
before the window
Share balance,
latest filed
ChangeLatest balance
at market
Brodie Gage
SVP Global Products & Supply
19,959−10,544−10,46140,653
before Nov 17, 2025
39,607
Jul 15, 2026
-2.6%$14,933,819
Grant Hoffman
SVP Chief Supply Chain Officer
6,5170
before Jun 22, 2026
6,517
Jun 22, 2026
$2,457,235
Joseph Cumello
SVP, General Mgr. Blue Planet
29,411−14,782−15,28843,531
before Dec 16, 2025
42,872
Jun 26, 2026
-1.5%$16,164,888
Sheela Kosaraju
SVP and General Counsel
19,721−10,146−6,15584,661
before Dec 16, 2025
88,081
Jul 1, 2026
4.0%$33,210,941
The row adds: opening balance, plus awards and deliveries, less withholding and sales, plus other filed movements, equals the latest balance. The opening figure is the position before the first filed transaction of the window — the filings state the balance after each transaction, so the first line's own effect is removed from it rather than counted twice. Every quantity in the row belongs to one ownership form: the direct holdings where a filer reports them, and any indirect holdings noted separately beside the closing balance. Balances are the filer's own stated shares owned following each transaction. Share-settled restricted stock vests without a separately reported transaction, so no closing unvested balance is derived — the components are shown instead.

Open-market sales — summary by insider

InsiderShares soldWeighted
avg price
ValueLotsTrading-plan status, as filed Period
Gary B. Smith
President, CEO
149,169$273.54$40,804,39218 lots
18 days
all shares indicated under a planNov 3, 2025 – Jul 15, 2026
Jason Phipps
SVP Global Sales and Marketing
46,026$337.80$15,547,53317 lots
3 days
all shares indicated under a planJan 15, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026
David Rothenstein
SVP and Chief Strategy Officer
22,500$353.90$7,962,6699 lots
9 days
all shares indicated under a planNov 17, 2025 – Jul 15, 2026
Brodie Gage
SVP Global Products & Supply
10,461$431.78$4,516,8697 lots
7 days
all shares indicated under a planNov 17, 2025 – Jul 15, 2026
Joseph Cumello
SVP, General Mgr. Blue Planet
15,288$273.49$4,181,1463 lots
3 days
all shares indicated under a planJan 12, 2026 – Jun 26, 2026
Dino DiPerna
SVP Global R&D
11,147$305.37$3,403,9418 lots
4 days
all shares indicated under a planNov 17, 2025 – Jul 15, 2026
Patrick T. Gallagher
non-employee director
11,618$227.45$2,642,4861 lots
1 days
all shares indicated under a planJan 12, 2026 – Jan 12, 2026
Sheela Kosaraju
SVP and General Counsel
6,155$367.51$2,262,0294 lots
4 days
all shares indicated under a planJan 2, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026
Thomas Michael Nevens
non-employee director
8,554$224.66$1,921,7421 lots
1 days
none indicated under a planDec 15, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025
Marc Graff
SVP & Chief Financial Officer
252$457.78$115,3612 lots
2 days
all shares indicated under a planJun 24, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026
Each row aggregates that insider's sale transactions across the window: shares are summed, the price is weighted by quantity, and the lot and day counts are shown so an aggregated row is never read as a single trade. This summary counts every ownership form; the "Sold" column in the rollforward above counts one. A rollforward has to bridge a single stated balance, so it uses only the form that balance belongs to — where an insider also sold from a trust or other indirect holding, that quantity appears here and not there, and the difference between the two figures is exactly the indirect portion. This window contains 70 sale transactions across 27 trading days, which is why the body carries the summary and not the register. Individual lots are available as a data export.
Plan status is as indicated on each filing: 69 of the 70 sale lines are indicated as made under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Sale prices are execution prices. Shares withheld to satisfy tax on vesting appear in their own column and are not sales.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Unvested balances from the fiscal 2025 annual disclosure. Market values at the closing price of Jul 31, 2026.
8
Directors

Directors

Current-year awards to non-employee directors.
8 non-employee directors received 5,097 units this year. 7 of them received exactly the same number, with Lawton W. Fitt on a different award — a fixed-unit program.
DirectorUnits awarded
this year
Value at
award-date close
Award dateCash fees
fiscal 2025
Share awards
fiscal 2025
All other
fiscal 2025
Total fiscal 2025Instrument, as filed
Lawton W. Fitt (board chair, fiscal 2025)862$334,447Mar 26, 2026$100,000$334,918$0$434,918862 Common Stock
Bruce L. Claflin605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$110,000$234,971$0$344,971605 Common Stock
Devinder Kumar605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$120,000$234,971$0$354,971605 Common Stock
Hassan Ahmed605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$101,000$234,971$0$335,971605 Common Stock
Joanne Beth Olsen605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$116,000$234,971$0$350,971605 Common Stock
Mary G. Puma605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$100,000$234,971$0$334,971605 Common Stock
Patrick T. Gallagher605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$110,000$234,971$0$344,971605 Common Stock
Thomas Michael Nevens605$234,734Mar 26, 2026$100,000$234,971$0$334,971605 Common Stock
The three right-hand money columns are the last disclosed year and are not comparable to the current-year award beside them — they are a full year of fees and awards, the award column is this year's grant alone. Both are shown because the question a reader asks is whether this year's award moved against last year's program, and that requires seeing both bases rather than a difference computed across them.

Reconciliation — how these units tie to the filings

LineDirectorsUnitsNote
Award transactions dated Mar 26, 20268 5,097 the board's main award date — the figure a same-date tally produces, which is not the date the officers were awarded on (Jun 22, 2026) — this board is paid on its own calendar
Current-year director awards8 5,097the award column above — each row its stated date's units, so a same-date tally and this column are the same number
All director award-coded lines in the window 5,097what a tally of every director line returns
All three totals agree: every award-coded director line in the window is a current-year award, and all of them fall on one date. The three lines are shown because they are three different questions, and a reader tallying the filings should land on the same number for each.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Fiscal 2025 director figures from the annual compensation disclosure.
9
Method and coverage

Method, coverage, and what we do not know

The page that says what this document cannot tell you.

Coverage of the filing window

Filings read
92
Transactions
225
Transaction codes present
F 126 · S 70 · A 29
Individuals
17 — 5 named executives, 4 other officers, 8 directors
Lines missing a quantity
0
Lines missing a date
0
Lines missing a running balance
0
Amended filings in the window
0
Every line in the window parsed and carries a quantity, a date and a running balance. Where that was not true, the count would appear above rather than be absorbed into a total — a document that silently drops what it could not read is indistinguishable from one that had nothing to drop.

Instruments seen, by line

Instrument, as filedLines
Common Stock225
Taken verbatim from the filings. This document does not normalize instrument names into a house taxonomy, because the filed name is the evidence.

Price basis, and how it was checked

Daily closes used
416 trading days
Award dates requiring a price
3, of which 3 fell on a trading day; the remainder use the preceding close, marked where used
Award dates left unpriced
0 — an unpriced award renders as “pending”, never as zero and never estimated
Settlement-priced lines
34 of 34 match same-day close to the cent
Open-market executions
70 of 70 fall inside that day's traded high-low range
Exercise-priced transactions
0 excluded — an exercise carries the option's strike price, not a market price.
The price source is independent of the filings, so where both state a price the comparison is a genuine check rather than a restatement. It is reported because a valuation built on an unchecked price series is a valuation resting on an assumption.
The settlement standard is this issuer's, not ours. Companies do not price settlement lines the same way — this one uses same-day close, and others use a different reference day. The convention is read from this issuer's own filings and named above, so a reader comparing two of these documents sees the test change because the issuer's practice differs, not because the standard was relaxed for one of them.

What this document does not know

1. Part of the long-term program is not filed. Performance share units — 36.0% of stated long-term value — are not reported at grant, so nothing here confirms they were made, at what target, or on what metrics.
2. No award in this window carries a confirmed classification. This document reports codes, quantities, dates and verbatim footnotes, and does not present award categories or classified subtotals. The sleeves on page 4 are the instrument names the filings themselves use, not classifications. Where a category would be useful — the deliveries on page 3 — the evidence is shown and the label withheld.
3. Vesting of share-settled awards is not separately reported, so no closing unvested balance is derived. See page 8.

Two tiers, stated once

Facts always; categories only when confirmed. Quantities, dates, codes, prices, balances and footnote text are reported wherever they exist. Category labels and classified subtotals are reported only where classification is confirmed — which, for this filer today, is nowhere. This document is built to be complete and honest in that state rather than to wait for it to change.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed. Prepared Aug 2, 2026. Position as filed through Jul 17, 2026.
10
Per-executive statements

Appendix A — per-executive statements

The three largest current-year awards, each with its own aggregated register.

Grant Hoffman — SVP Chief Supply Chain Officer

Award this year
6,517 units on Jun 22, 2026 — $2,999,971 at that day's close of $460.33
Composition
6,517 share-settled · 0 cash-settled (0.0% cash)
Share balance
0 before Jun 22, 2026 → 6,517 on Jun 22, 2026 (—)
Latest balance at market
$2,457,235
Withheld for tax
0 shares
Sold in the open market
none
Settled in cash
Unit balance, latest filed
no unit-denominated instrument filed for this executive
DateCodeInstrumentUnits ±Shares held
directly
Jun 22, 2026ACommon Stock6,5176,517
Rows are in the order the transactions were filed. The three balance columns are three separate populations and do not add: shares held directly, shares held through a trust or partnership, and units of a deferred or cash-settled instrument. A balance appears only in the column it belongs to, and a dash means that line stated no balance for that population — not zero. Prices are the prices stated on the filings themselves, which is why a withholding or sale price appears here on dates that carry no award and therefore appear in no valuation table.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed.
A
Register conventions

Appendix B — register conventions

How the registers in this document are built, in enough detail to reproduce them.

Transaction codes present in this window

CodeLinesMeaning
A29Acquisition of securities — an award, or a delivery of shares under an earlier award.
F126Shares retained by the company to satisfy tax withholding on vesting. Not a discretionary transaction.
S70Open-market sale.

Aggregation

Rule
Lines sharing date, code and instrument are aggregated into a single register row.
Quantity
Sum of the filed quantities.
Price
Weighted average of filed prices by quantity — never a simple mean, which would misweight unequal lots.
Lot count
Shown where more than one line is aggregated, so an aggregated row is never mistaken for a single transaction.
Balance
The running balance stated on the last line of the group — the filer's own figure, not a computed one.
Full lot detail
Available as a data export. This document carries the aggregated view because the lot list is a working file, not a reading surface.

Balance movements from outside this window

A filer's stated share balance is a running total that spans their whole filing history, not this window. Where two consecutive rows of a register differ by more than the later row's own quantity, the difference was moved by a transaction filed outside the period this document covers — most often an earlier gift, transfer or exercise. The register marks the step where it occurs and does not absorb it into a neighboring row, because a register that silently balances is one a reader cannot reproduce against the filings.

Price reconciliation — the lines that differ

DateInsiderCode Price as filedClosing priceDifference
No priced line failed its test in this window.
All differences are open-market sales, which execute during the trading day at prices that are not the close. The filed price is the executed price and is the figure used in this document wherever a sale is valued; the closing price is used only where no filed price exists, which is the case for awards.
Source: insider transaction filings, as filed.
B