CompBrief BY VELARION

Companies ViaSat

ViaSat (VSAT): executive pay, fiscal 2026

Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.

Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →

Email me ViaSat’s executive pay brief as a PDF

You get it on this page the moment you ask, and a copy by email. Every figure is cited to its filing.

After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.

Also free: The Pay Desk, the weekly executive pay briefing.

Compensation figures for fiscal year 2026 are temporarily unavailable — recheck shortly.

Say-on-pay support97.58%Latest vote · source
CEO vs. named peers26th pct.Of 19 peer CEOs
CEO pay ratio63:1To the median employee · source

Executives and directors

Frequently asked questions

Who was the highest-paid executive at ViaSat in fiscal 2026?
ViaSat's highest-paid executive for fiscal 2026 is temporarily unavailable.
How does ViaSat's chief executive pay compare to its disclosed peer group?
As disclosed, the chief executive's total compensation ranked at the 26th percentile of ViaSat's disclosed peer group.
What is ViaSat's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio?
As disclosed, ViaSat's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio was 63:1.
How did shareholders vote on ViaSat's executive compensation?
As disclosed, 97.58% of shareholders supported ViaSat's executive compensation in the latest say-on-pay vote.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Full detail

Every table from the filing. Open any section.

Summary compensation table

No Summary Compensation Table is on file for fiscal year 2026.

Equity grants and outstanding awards

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2026

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
Garrett ChaseRSU2025-08-17——78,750—$2,134,125
Craig MillerRSU2025-08-17——45,940—1,244,974
Girish ChandranPSU2025-08-1711,48522,970—45,940758,929
Mark DankbergPSU2025-08-1759,065118,130—236,2603,903,015
Robert BlairPSU2025-08-1711,48522,970—45,940758,929
Mark DankbergRSU2025-08-17——236,250—6,402,375
Robert BlairRSU2025-08-17——45,940—1,244,974
Girish ChandranRSU2025-08-17——45,940—1,244,974
Garrett ChaseRSU2025-12-04——63,000—2,213,820
Garrett ChasePSU2025-08-1719,69039,380—78,7601,301,115
Craig MillerPSU2025-08-1711,48522,970—45,940758,929

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Named executive officerTime-vested (RSU)Performance-vested (PSU)Options / SARs% performance-vested
Garrett Chase$4,347,945$1,301,115$023.0%
Craig Miller1,244,974758,929037.9%
Girish Chandran1,244,974758,929037.9%
Mark Dankberg6,402,3753,903,015037.9%
Robert Blair1,244,974758,929037.9%

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2026

ExecutiveAwardShares unvestedExercise priceMarket value unvested
ChandranOption7,13615.96—
ChandranRSU7,362—337,180
BlairRSU7,362—337,180
MillerRSU8,834—404,597
ChandranPSU9,470—433,726
BlairPSU9,470—433,726
MillerPSU11,141—510,258
MillerOption11,89315.96—
BlairOption11,89315.96—
ChandranRSU12,499—572,454
BlairRSU12,499—572,454
MillerRSU14,706—673,535
ChandranRSU16,666—763,303
BlairRSU16,666—763,303
MillerRSU19,608—898,046
ChandranPSU22,970—1,052,026
MillerPSU22,970—1,052,026
BlairPSU22,970—1,052,026
DankbergOption35,68015.96—
ChasePSU39,380—1,803,604
DankbergRSU42,021—1,924,562
ChandranRSU45,940—2,104,052
MillerRSU45,940—2,104,052
BlairRSU45,940—2,104,052
ChaseRSU52,095—2,385,951
DankbergPSU52,919—2,423,690
ChasePSU59,199—2,711,314
ChaseRSU62,514—2,863,141
ChaseRSU63,000—2,885,400
DankbergRSU69,852—3,199,222
ChaseRSU78,750—3,606,750
DankbergRSU93,137—4,265,675
DankbergPSU118,130—5,410,354
DankbergRSU236,250—10,820,250
Director compensation

No director compensation table is on file for fiscal year 2026.

Peer group, and who names ViaSat as a peer

Companies that benchmark against VSAT

19 companies name VSAT as a compensation peer

The list of companies that name VSAT as a peer is temporarily unavailable — recheck shortly.

Disclosed peer group — fiscal year 2026

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

COHR Coherent CorpCIEN Ciena CorporationEQIX Equinix IncFN FabrinetAKAM Akamai Technologies IncFFIV F5, Inc.FTNT Fortinet, Inc.EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc.GEN Gen Digital, Inc.LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.TDG Transdigm Group Inc.IAC IAC/InteractivecorpSBAC SBA Communications CorpNTNX Nutanix, Inc.VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc.PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc.PTC PTC Inc.RXT Rackspace Technology, Inc.RNG RingCentral, Inc.

Peer reciprocity

Of the companies ViaSat names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Coherent Corp (COHR) Ciena Corporation (CIEN) Equinix Inc (EQIX) Fabrinet (FN) Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) F5, Inc. (FFIV) Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) Gen Digital, Inc. (GEN) Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) Transdigm Group Inc. (TDG) IAC/Interactivecorp (IAC) SBA Communications Corp (SBAC) Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) Palo Alto Networks Inc. (PANW) PTC Inc. (PTC) Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) RingCentral, Inc. (RNG)

Reciprocity shown where the peer’s own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer’s filing. A dash means the peer’s current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including ViaSat.

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
—Coherent Corp——————not in coverage universe
—Ciena Corporation——————not in coverage universe
—Equinix Inc——————not in coverage universe
—Fabrinet——————not in coverage universe
—Akamai Technologies Inc——————not in coverage universe
—F5, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Fortinet, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Extreme Networks, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Gen Digital, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Lumentum Holdings Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Transdigm Group Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—IAC/Interactivecorp——————not in coverage universe
—SBA Communications Corp——————not in coverage universe
—Nutanix, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Viavi Solutions Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Palo Alto Networks Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—PTC Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Rackspace Technology, Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—RingCentral, Inc.——————not in coverage universe

Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Incentive design against the same peers

CompanyAnnual incentive payoutLong-term vehicle mixPSU measures include TSRCompensation consultant
ViaSatnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Akamai Technologies Incnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Ciena Corporationnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Coherent Corpnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Equinix Incnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Extreme Networks, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
F5, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Fabrinetnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Fortinet, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Gen Digital, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
IAC/Interactivecorpnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Lumentum Holdings Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Nutanix, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Palo Alto Networks Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
PTC Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Rackspace Technology, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
RingCentral, Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
SBA Communications Corpnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Transdigm Group Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Viavi Solutions Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed

Read from each company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company’s filing does not state the item.

Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20262026-09-03111,567,5602,768,292559,03397.58%Passed
20252025-09-0494,363,8204,413,5211,200,58895.53%Passed
20242024-09-0582,772,71319,517,898311,57680.92%Passed
20242024-09-0582,772,71319,517,898311,57680.92%Passed
20232023-09-0791,663,4243,238,750315,13696.59%Passed
20222022-09-0153,992,3114,718,720148,55091.96%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company’s computation
20262026-09-0397.58%a
20252025-09-0495.53%b
20242024-09-0580.92%c

a. Voting standard not stated in the filing.

b. Voting standard not stated in the filing.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “In tabulating the voting results for each proposal, neither abstentions nor shares that constitute broker non-votes are considered votes cast on that proposal. Because abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered votes cast, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.”.

Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

CEO pay ratio

Ratio (CEO : median employee)63 : 1
CEO total compensation—
Median employee compensation$225,659
Insider trades since the proxy

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

Sources (16 citations)

Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

  • Section 03, Garrett Chase RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Craig Miller RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Girish Chandran PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Mark Dankberg PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Robert Blair PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Mark Dankberg RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Robert Blair RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Girish Chandran RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Garrett Chase RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Garrett Chase PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Craig Miller PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 07, pay ratio. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-27. Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: 63 : 1. View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2026 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2026-09-04. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 97.58% (votes for as printed: 111,567,560). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-09-05. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 95.53% (votes for as printed: 94,363,820). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-09-09. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 80.92% (votes for as printed: 82,772,713). View filing ↗
  • Section 03b vehicle mix (computed). Computed. RSU / PSU / Options grant-date fair values summed per officer from the grants table; % performance-vested = PSU ÷ (RSU+PSU+Options).
Get the full report — $500