Companies RCM Technologies
RCM Technologies (RCMT): executive pay, fiscal 2024
Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.
Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →Email me RCM Technologies’s executive pay brief as a PDF
You get it on this page the moment you ask, and a copy by email. Every figure is cited to its filing.
After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.
RCM Technologies's highest-paid named officer for fiscal year 2024, Executive Chairman & President Bradley Vizi, was paid $7,731,221 · source
Executives and directors
Frequently asked questions
Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.
Full detail
Every table from the filing. Open any section.
Summary compensation table
| Named executive officer | Salary | Bonus | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | Pension / NQDC | All other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley Vizi | $475,000 | $0 | $7,250,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $6,221 | $7,731,221 |
| Executive Chairman & President | ||||||||
| Kevin Miller | 370,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22,197 | 392,197 |
| Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||
| Michael Saks | 300,000 | 0 | 75,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14,896 | 389,896 |
| Division President, Health Care Services | ||||||||
A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.
Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive
| Named executive officer | FY2024 total | FY2023 total | FY2022 total | Δ FY2023→2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley Vizi | $7,731,221 | $3,606,274 | $2,446,200 | ↑ +4,124,947 |
| Kevin Miller | 392,197 | 393,294 | 647,389 | ↓ −1,097 |
| Michael Saks | 389,896 | 389,176 | 715,984 | ↑ +720 |
Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.
Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis
The compensation of our named executive officers is designed to reward strong annual operating performance by the Company.
| CEO STI target (% of salary) | — |
|---|---|
| CEO LTI target (% of salary) | — |
| Independent consultant | — |
| Clawback policy | true |
| Anti-hedging | — |
| Anti-pledging | — |
Equity grants and outstanding awards
No plan-based awards are on file for this fiscal year.
Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2024
| Executive | Award | Shares unvested | Exercise price | Market value unvested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Saks | RSU | 16,011 | — | $370,975 |
| Bradley Vizi | RSU | 500,000 | — | 11,585,000 |
Director compensation
| Director | Cash fees | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | All other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swarna Srinivas KakodkarIndependent · Lead Independent Director · Audit · Compensation · Nominating Corporate Governance | $55,000 | $45,000 | — | — | $0 | $100,000 |
| Chigozie O. AmadiIndependent · Audit · Compensation · Nominating Corporate Governance | 55,000 | 45,000 | — | — | 0 | 100,000 |
| Jayanth S. KomarneniIndependent · Audit · Compensation · Nominating Corporate Governance | 50,000 | 45,000 | — | — | 0 | 95,000 |
| Bradley S. ViziEmployee director · Board Chair | — | — | — | — | — | 0 |
Board fee structure and ownership guideline
| Annual cash retainer | $45,000 |
|---|---|
| Annual equity retainer | $45,000 |
| Per board meeting fee | $0 |
| Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov) | 10,000 / 10,000 / 5,000 |
| Stock ownership guideline | $225,000 |
Total cost of the board
| Component | FY2024 |
|---|---|
| Cash retainers and fees | $160,000 |
| Equity awards (grant-date value) | $135,000 |
| All other compensation | $0 |
| Total cost of the board | $295,000 |
Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.
Peer group, and who names RCM Technologies as a peer
Companies that benchmark against RCMT
3 companies name RCMT as a compensation peer
- FRANKLIN COVEY COFCFY2025
- STREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.STRMFY2024
- TruBridge, Inc.CPSIFY2024
Each company listed discloses RCMT in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named RCMT in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.
Chief executive pay against the peer group
Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.
| Rank | Company | FY | Chief executive | Salary | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RCM Technologies | 2024 | Bradley Vizi | $475,000 | $7,250,000 | $0 | $0 | $7,731,221 |
Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.
Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
| Meeting year | Meeting date | For | Against | Abstain | Support | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-12-18 | 2,791,848 | 1,702,971 | 147,703 | 62.11% | Passed |
| 2024 | 2024-12-12 | 4,541,035 | 530,125 | 15,160 | 89.55% | Passed |
| 2023 | 2023-12-14 | 4,909,822 | 192,027 | 12,057 | 96.24% | Passed |
| 2022 | 2022-12-15 | 5,668,371 | 347,077 | 12,848 | 94.23% | Passed |
| 2021 | 2021-12-16 | 5,898,645 | 104,609 | 14,629 | 98.26% | Passed |
| 2020 | 2020-12-17 | 5,379,167 | 682,166 | 51,566 | 88.75% | Passed |
Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.
Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation
| Meeting year | Meeting date | Approval — company’s computation |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-12-18 | 62.11%a |
| 2024 | 2024-12-12 | 89.55%b |
| 2023 | 2023-12-14 | 96.24%c |
a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “All other matters to be voted upon at the meeting must be approved by a majority of the votes cast on those matters. || Abstentions: Shares represented by a proxy marked "abstain" on any matter will be considered present at the meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum but will not be considered as votes cast on that matter.”.
b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “All other matters to be voted upon at the meeting must be approved by a majority of the votes cast on those matters. || Abstentions: Shares represented by a proxy marked "abstain" on any matter will be considered present at the meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum but will not be considered as votes cast on that matter.”.
c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “All other matters to be voted upon at the meeting must be approved by a majority of the votes cast on those matters. || Abstentions: Shares represented by a proxy marked "abstain" on any matter will be considered present at the meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum but will not be considered as votes cast on that matter.”.
Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.
Insider trades since the proxy
No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.
Sources (13 citations)
Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.
- Section 01, Bradley Vizi. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 7,731,221. View filing ↗
- Section 01, Kevin Miller. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 392,197. View filing ↗
- Section 01, Michael Saks. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Executive Compensation”. As printed: 389,896. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Swarna Srinivas Kakodkar. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 100,000. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Chigozie O. Amadi. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 100,000. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Jayanth S. Komarneni. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 95,000. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Bradley S. Vizi. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-12-22. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 62.11% (votes for as printed: 2,791,848). View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-12-16. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 89.55% (votes for as printed: 4,541,035). View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2023 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2023-12-15. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 96.24% (votes for as printed: 4,909,822). View filing ↗
- Section 01 trend, Δ column (computed). Computed. Δ = current-FY total − prior-FY total per named officer.
- Section 09b board cost (computed). Computed. Cash 160,000 + equity 135,000 + all other 0 = 295,000, summed across the director compensation table rows.
- RCM Technologies (subject), Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2025-11-13. CEO total compensation as printed in RCM Technologies's own proxy. As printed: 7,731,221. View filing ↗