Velarion · Company Intelligence
Compensation Brief
Fiscal year 2025 · Filings through 2026-06-01

ProFrac Holding (ACDC)

Fiscal year 2025 executive and director compensation, incentive-plan design, equity activity, and governance — every figure in this brief is traceable to its exact location in the company’s SEC filing — the document, the section, the page, and the table, linked directly.

$1,530,120
Austin Harbour total, FY2025
Chief Financial Officerhighest-paid officer; CEO Johnathan Wilks: $1,382,583
CEO (Johnathan Wilks) pay percentile vs peers
CEO-to-median pay ratio
99.62%
Say-on-pay support, latest vote
Companies that benchmark against ACDC
2 companies name ACDC as a compensation peer

Each company listed discloses ACDC in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named ACDC in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.

01

Summary Compensation Table — fiscal year 2025

Named executive officerSalaryBonusStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentivePension / NQDCAll otherTotal
Austin Harbour$450,000$0$632,996$0$427,500$0$19,623$1,530,120
Chief Financial Officer
Johnathan Wilks475,0000780,488047,500079,5951,382,583
Chief Executive Officer

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Named executive officerFY2025 totalFY2024 totalFY2023 totalΔ FY20242025
Austin Harbour$1,530,120
Johnathan Wilks1,382,583

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

02

Equity transactions since the proxy statement was filed

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

03

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2025

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
Johnathan L. WilksPRSU$780,488
Austin HarbourPRSU632,996
03b

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Grant-level vehicle detail not disclosed.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

04

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2025

ExecutiveAwardShares unvestedExercise priceMarket value unvested
Austin HarbourPSU116,732$454,087
WilksPSU92,088358,222
WilksPSU85,603332,996
WilksPSU56,619220,248
Austin HarbourPSU77,821302,724
WilksPSU138,132537,333
WilksPSU52,631204,735
WilksPSU128,405499,495
05

Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis

our executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-performance philosophy that emphasizes long-term equity awards intended to align our executives interests with stockholders long-term interests

CEO STI target (% of salary)
CEO LTI target (% of salary)
Independent consultant
Clawback policyTrue
Anti-hedgingTrue
Anti-pledgingTrue
06

Say-on-pay — recent advisory votes

Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20262026-05-27157,287,850588,64814,50599.62%Passed
20252025-05-28146,712,466738,80677,35299.45%Passed
20242024-05-30134,767,5539,282,43622,72293.54%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company's computation
20262026-05-2799.62%a
20252025-05-2899.45%b
20242024-05-3093.54%c

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “3, abstentions are treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of such proposal and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote "against" such a proposal.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “3, abstentions are treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of such proposal and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote "against" such a proposal.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “3, abstentions are treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of such proposal and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote "against" such a proposal.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

07

CEO pay ratio

Ratio (CEO : median employee)
CEO total compensation
Median employee compensation
08

Director compensation — fiscal year 2025

DirectorCash feesStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveAll otherTotal
Theresa GlebockiIndependent · Audit (Chair) · Compensation$175,000$150,000$0$0$325,000
Stacy NieuwoudtIndependent · Compensation (Chair) · Audit170,000150,00000320,000
Gerald W. HaddockIndependent · Audit · Compensation153,500150,00000303,500
Sergei KrylovNot independent117,500150,00000267,500
James Coy Randle JrNot independent · Departed during FY119,000000119,000
Matthew D. WilksEmployee director · Board Chair00000
Matthew RinaldiNot independent · Newly elected00000
09

Board fee structure and ownership guideline

Annual cash retainer$95,000
Annual equity retainer$150,000
Per board meeting fee
Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov)20,000 / 15,000 / 15,000
Stock ownership guideline
09b

Total cost of the board

ComponentFY2025
Cash retainers and fees$735,000
Equity awards (grant-date value)$600,000
All other compensation$0
Total cost of the board$1,335,000

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

10b

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
1ProFrac Holding2025Johnathan Wilks$475,000$780,488$0$47,500$1,382,583

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

11

Source register

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

#SupportsDocumentFiledAccessionLocation in document
1Section 01, Austin HarbourDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 1,530,120. Filing ↗machine: r5 · c35 · span 321410–321419
2Section 01, Johnathan WilksDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 1,382,583. Filing ↗machine: r3 · c35 · span 312739–312748
3Section 03, Johnathan L. Wilks PRSUDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” · grants of plan-based awards table. Filing ↗machine: t7 · r3 · c17 · span 310742–310749
4Section 03, Austin Harbour PRSUDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” · grants of plan-based awards table. Filing ↗machine: t7 · r5 · c17 · span 319520–319527
5Section 07, pay ratio10-K2026-03-130001193125-26-106120Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: —. Filing ↗
6Section 08, Theresa GlebockiDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 325,000. Filing ↗machine: t4 · r3 · c17 · span 230323–230330
7Section 08, Stacy NieuwoudtDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 320,000. Filing ↗machine: t4 · r2 · c17 · span 228201–228208
8Section 08, Gerald W. HaddockDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 303,500. Filing ↗machine: t4 · r1 · c17 · span 226105–226112
9Section 08, Sergei KrylovDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 267,500. Filing ↗machine: t4 · r4 · c17 · span 232417–232424
10Section 08, James Coy Randle JrDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 119,000. Filing ↗machine: t4 · r5 · c5 · span 233640–233647
11Section 08, Matthew D. WilksDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. Filing ↗
12Section 08, Matthew RinaldiDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. Filing ↗
13Section 06, 2026 voteForm 8-K2026-06-010001104659-26-068890Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 99.62% (votes for as printed: 157,287,850). Filing ↗
14Section 06, 2025 voteForm 8-K2025-06-030001104659-25-055961Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 99.45% (votes for as printed: 146,712,466). Filing ↗
15Section 06, 2024 voteForm 8-K2024-05-310001104659-24-067298Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 93.54% (votes for as printed: 134,767,553). Filing ↗
16Section 09b board cost (computed)ComputedcomputedCash 735,000 + equity 600,000 + all other 0 = 1,335,000, summed across the director compensation table rows.machine: formula: Σ = 1,335,000
17ProFrac Holding (subject), Section 10b CEO totalDEF 14A2026-04-270001104659-26-049044CEO total compensation as printed in ProFrac Holding's own proxy. As printed: 1,382,583. Filing ↗machine: r3 · c35 · span 312739–312748