CompBrief BY VELARION

Companies Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN (CP): executive pay, fiscal 2025

Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.

Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →

Email me Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN’s executive pay brief as a PDF

You get it on this page the moment you ask; press Download and a copy goes to your email too. Every figure is cited to its filing.

After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.

Also free: The Pay Desk, the weekly executive pay briefing.
CEO total pay$25,655,819CEO Keith Creel · source
Say-on-pay support87.48%Latest vote · source
CEO vs. named peers83rd pct.Of 18 peer CEOs
CEO pay ratio183:1To the median employee · source

CEO pay, last three years

  • $20,079,552FY2023
  • $23,572,602FY2024
  • $25,655,819FY2025

CEO total pay was $25,655,819 in fiscal 2025, up from $23,572,602 in fiscal 2024.

FY2025: salary $1,887,030 · bonus $0 · stock awards $12,022,313 · option awards $6,780,204

Frequently asked questions

Who was the highest-paid executive at Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN in fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, Keith Creel (President and Chief Executive Officer) was the highest-paid executive at Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN in fiscal 2025, with total compensation of $25,655,819.
How does Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's chief executive pay compare to its disclosed peer group?
As disclosed, Keith Creel's total compensation ranked at the 83rd percentile of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's disclosed peer group.
What is Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio?
As disclosed, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio was 183:1.
How did shareholders vote on Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's executive compensation?
As disclosed, 87.48% of shareholders supported Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's executive compensation in the latest say-on-pay vote.
How much does Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN spend in total on board compensation for fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN reported total board compensation of $5,101,678 for fiscal 2025.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Full detail

Every table from the filing. Open any section.

Summary compensation table
Named executive officerSalaryBonusStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentivePension / NQDCAll otherTotal
Keith Creel$1,887,030$0$12,022,313$6,780,204$3,761,742$875,761$328,769$25,655,819
President and Chief Executive Officer
Nadeem Velani1,119,75002,714,4321,809,6261,228,169373,84669,0537,314,876
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
John Brooks1,032,97402,383,0981,588,7021,200,522181,632113,8956,500,823
Executive Vice-President and Chief Marketing Officer
Mark Redd1,023,97502,344,1441,532,7981,190,005212,526125,4106,428,858
Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer
James Clements659,78401,571,772867,023724,224382,00057,1354,261,938
Executive Vice-President Strategic Planning and Corporate Services

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Named executive officerFY2025 totalFY2024 totalFY2023 totalΔ FY2024→2025
Keith Creel$25,655,819$23,572,602$20,079,552↑ +2,083,217
Nadeem Velani7,314,8767,468,93511,925,165↓ −154,059
John Brooks6,500,8236,918,65410,641,918↓ −417,831
Mark Redd6,428,8586,719,45910,359,887↓ −290,601
James Clements4,261,9384,726,8996,443,570↓ −464,961

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Our executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance, to align management interests with our business strategy and the interests of our shareholders, and to engage and retain our executives. It supports an operations-focused culture, is linked to critical metrics that drive the achievement of our strategic plan without taking on undue risk, and is designed to create long-term sustainable value for our shareholders.

CEO STI target (% of salary)—
CEO LTI target (% of salary)—
Independent consultantFrederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.
Clawback policytrue
Anti-hedgingtrue
Anti-pledgingtrue
Equity grants and outstanding awards

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2025

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
John BrooksPSU2025-02-04—22,107——$2,383,098
John BrooksOPTION2025-02-04——52,147—1,588,702
James ClementsPSU2025-02-04—11,793——1,300,532
James ClementsOPTION2025-02-04——33,887—867,023
James ClementsRSU2025-02-04——2,460—271,240
Keith CreelPSU2025-02-04—94,346——10,170,342
Keith CreelOPTION2025-02-04——222,551—6,780,204
Keith CreelPSU2025-06-30—16,714——1,851,971
Mark ReddPSU2025-02-04—19,196——2,069,308
Mark ReddOPTION2025-02-04——50,312—1,532,798
Mark ReddRSU2025-02-04——2,550—274,836
Nadeem VelaniPSU2025-02-04—24,614——2,714,432
Nadeem VelaniOPTION2025-02-04——70,728—1,809,626

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Named executive officerTime-vested (RSU)Performance-vested (PSU)Options / SARs% performance-vested
John Brooks$0$2,383,098$1,588,70260.0%
James Clements271,2401,300,532867,02353.3%
Keith Creel012,022,3136,780,20463.9%
Mark Redd274,8362,069,3081,532,79853.4%
Nadeem Velani02,714,4321,809,62660.0%

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

No outstanding equity awards are on file for this fiscal year.

Director compensation
DirectorCash feesStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveAll otherTotal
Isabelle CourvilleIndependent · Board Chair · Audit and Finance · Management Resources and Compensation$353,190$353,190——$1,000$707,380
Janet KennedyIndependent · Audit and Finance (Chair)0466,036——1,398467,434
Matthew PaullIndependent · Audit and Finance · Management Resources and Compensation (Chair)0466,036——1,398467,434
Amb. Antonio Garza (Ret)Independent0410,124——51,719461,843
Hon. Edward HambergerIndependent0452,058——1,398453,456
Gordon TraftonIndependent · Management Resources and Compensation226,029226,029——1,398453,456
Hon. John Baird, P.CIndependent0449,343——1,000450,343
Arturo Gutiérrez HernándezIndependent · Audit and Finance0410,124——1,398411,522
Henry MaierIndependent · Audit and Finance · Management Resources and Compensation205,062205,062——1,398411,522
Andrea RobertsonIndependent · Management Resources and Compensation203,822203,822——1,000408,644
Jane PeverettIndependent · Audit and Finance203,822203,822——1,000408,644
Keith CreelEmployee director—————0
Katharine StevensonIndependent · Newly elected——————

Board fee structure and ownership guideline

Annual cash retainer$300,000
Annual equity retainer—
Per board meeting fee—
Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov)40,000 / 40,000 / 30,000
Stock ownership guideline$5

Total cost of the board

ComponentFY2025
Cash retainers and fees$1,191,925
Equity awards (grant-date value)$3,845,646
All other compensation$64,107
Total cost of the board$5,101,678

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

Peer group, and who names Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN as a peer

Companies that benchmark against CP

4 companies name CP as a compensation peer

Each company listed discloses CP in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named CP in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.

Disclosed peer group — fiscal year 2025

The peer group as the company's own proxy names it, the “Class I Railroads” and “North American Capital-Intensive Companies” — the reference set behind the percentile above.

NSC Norfolk Southern CorporationBNSF BNSF Railway CompanyCN Canadian National Railway CompanyNTR Nutrien Ltd.SU Suncor Energy Inc.GOLD Barrick Mining CorporationFDX FedEx CorporationTRP TC Energy CorporationBCE BCE Inc.TIXT TELUS CorporationCNQ Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.UPS United Parcel Service Inc.CVE Cenovus Energy Inc.RSG Republic Services Inc.CSX CSX CorporationUNP Union Pacific CorporationENB Enbridge Inc.

Peer reciprocity

The companies Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN names as compensation peers that name it back in their own disclosed peer groups.

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
1FedEx Corporation2026Rajesh Subramaniam$1,550,000$6,731,364$3,715,062$10,593,500$27,554,018
2Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN2025Keith Creel1,887,03012,022,3136,780,2043,761,74225,655,819
3Enbridge Inc.2025Gregory Ebel1,962,49713,441,6273,360,3814,331,92424,388,263
4CSX Corporation2025Joseph Hinrichs1,113,63610,029,0022,500,0081,481,13723,696,453
5United Parcel Service Inc.2025Carol Tomé1,509,71317,550,5461,358,7542,264,56922,878,788
6Union Pacific Corporation2025V. James Vena1,475,0009,000,1306,000,0033,437,25020,296,362
7Norfolk Southern Corporation2025Mark George1,100,0009,199,7332,300,0102,932,87516,245,050
8Republic Services Inc.2025Jon Vander Ark1,302,69211,124,48901,982,66414,857,016
9Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.2025Kevin Freeman1,033,6802,377,60608,167,84711,615,896
10Barrick Mining Corporation2026Gregory Roberts1,000,00000595,2222,087,219
—Bnsf Railway Company——————not in coverage universe
—Canadian National Railway Company——————not in coverage universe
—Nutrien Ltd.——————not in coverage universe
—Suncor Energy Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—TC Energy Corporation——————not in coverage universe
—BCE Inc.——————not in coverage universe
—Telus Corporation——————not in coverage universe
—Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.——————not in coverage universe
—Cenovus Energy Inc.——————not in coverage universe

Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Incentive design against the same peers

CompanyAnnual incentive payoutLong-term vehicle mixPSU measures include TSRCompensation consultant
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CNnot disclosedPSU 60 · Option 40not disclosedFrederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.
Barrick Mining Corporationnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
BCE Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Bnsf Railway Companynot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Canadian National Railway Companynot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Cenovus Energy Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
CSX Corporation76%PSU 60 · Option 20 · RSU 20NoPay Governance, LLC
Enbridge Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosedMercer (Canada) Limited
FedEx Corporation112.5%not disclosedYes — Relative TSR (FY24-FY26 LTI Cash Plan)Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC
Norfolk Southern Corporation118.5%not disclosedYes — relative TSRFW Cook
Nutrien Ltd.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.not disclosednot disclosedYes — Three-year relative TSR compared to companies in the Dow Jones Transportation AveragePearl Meyer
Republic Services Inc.91.79%PSU 80 · RSU 20NoPearl Meyer & Partners, LLC
Suncor Energy Inc.not disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
TC Energy Corporationnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Telus Corporationnot disclosednot disclosednot disclosednot disclosed
Union Pacific Corporation138%PSU 60 · Options 40NoPay Governance
United Parcel Service Inc.75%PSU 93 · Options 7Yes — Relative Total Shareowner Return (RTSR)FW Cook

Read from each company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company’s filing does not state the item.

Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20262026-04-29619,719,13288,693,966087.48%Passed
20252025-04-30646,115,61490,257,305087.74%Passed
20242024-04-24693,562,74143,869,121094.05%Passed
20232023-06-15689,561,34529,119,185095.95%Passed
20222022-04-27677,344,21054,770,484092.52%Passed
20212021-04-21102,334,4773,546,268096.65%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company’s computation
20262026-04-2987.48%a
20252025-04-3087.74%b
20242024-04-2494.05%c

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the resolution set out below and, unless otherwise instructed, the persons designated in the form of proxy or the voting instruction form intend to vote FOR the following resolution: "RESOLVED, on an advisory basis and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers of Canadian Pacific as disclosed in the Corporation's proxy statement (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables) delivered in advance of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC and Canadian securities regulatory authorities." Vote Required for Approval In order to be approved, the advisory resolution on the compensation of our NEOs requires an affirmative vote of the majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the resolution set out below and, unless otherwise instructed, the persons designated in the form of proxy or the voting instruction form intend to vote FOR the following resolution: "RESOLVED, on an advisory basis and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers of Canadian Pacific as disclosed in the Corporation's proxy statement (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables) delivered in advance of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC and Canadian securities regulatory authorities." Vote Required for Approval In order to be approved, the advisory resolution on the compensation of our NEOs requires an affirmative vote of the majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the resolution set out below and, unless otherwise instructed, the persons designated in the form of proxy or the voting instruction form intend to vote FOR the following resolution: "RESOLVED, on an advisory basis and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers of Canadian Pacific as disclosed in the Corporation's proxy statement (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables) delivered in advance of the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC and Canadian securities regulatory authorities." Vote Required for Approval In order to be approved, the advisory resolution on the compensation of our NEOs requires an affirmative vote of the majority of the votes duly cast at the Meeting.”.

Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

CEO pay ratio

Ratio (CEO : median employee)183 : 1
CEO total compensation$25,655,819
Median employee compensation$140,021
Insider trades since the proxy

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

Sources (50 citations)

Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

  • Section 01, Keith Creel. 10-K/A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Summary Compensation Table” · page 38. As printed: 25,655,819. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Nadeem Velani. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 7,314,876. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, John Brooks. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 6,500,823. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Mark Redd. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 6,428,858. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, James Clements. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 4,261,938. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, John Brooks PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, John Brooks OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, James Clements PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, James Clements OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, James Clements RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Keith Creel PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Keith Creel OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Keith Creel PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Mark Redd PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Mark Redd OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Mark Redd RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Nadeem Velani PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Nadeem Velani OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 07, pay ratio. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: 183 : 1. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Isabelle Courville. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 707,380. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Janet Kennedy. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 467,434. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Matthew Paull. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 467,434. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Amb. Antonio Garza (Ret). DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 461,843. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Hon. Edward Hamberger. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 453,456. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Gordon Trafton. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 453,456. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Hon. John Baird, P.C. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 450,343. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Arturo Gutiérrez Hernández. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 411,522. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Henry Maier. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 411,522. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Andrea Robertson. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 408,644. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Jane Peverett. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 408,644. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Keith Creel. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Katharine Stevenson. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-23. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: —. View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2026 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2026-04-30. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 87.48% (votes for as printed: 619,719,132 (87.48%)). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-05-02. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 87.74% (votes for as printed: 646,115,614 (87.74%)). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-04-25. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 94.05% (votes for as printed: 693,562,741 (94.05%)). View filing ↗
  • Section 01 trend, Δ column (computed). Computed. Δ = current-FY total − prior-FY total per named officer.
  • Section 03b vehicle mix (computed). Computed. RSU / PSU / Options grant-date fair values summed per officer from the grants table; % performance-vested = PSU ÷ (RSU+PSU+Options).
  • Section 09b board cost (computed). Computed. Cash 1,191,925 + equity 3,845,646 + all other 64,107 = 5,101,678, summed across the director compensation table rows.
  • FedEx Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-08-17. CEO total compensation as printed in FedEx Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 27,554,018. View filing ↗
  • Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN (subject), Section 10b CEO total. 10-K/A, filed 2026-04-23. CEO total compensation as printed in Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN's own proxy. As printed: 25,655,819. View filing ↗
  • Enbridge Inc., Section 10b CEO total. 10-K/A, filed 2026-03-10. CEO total compensation as printed in Enbridge Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 24,388,263. View filing ↗
  • CSX Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-30. CEO total compensation as printed in CSX Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 23,696,453. View filing ↗
  • United Parcel Service Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-19. CEO total compensation as printed in United Parcel Service Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 22,878,788. View filing ↗
  • Union Pacific Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-25. CEO total compensation as printed in Union Pacific Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 20,296,362. View filing ↗
  • Norfolk Southern Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-27. CEO total compensation as printed in Norfolk Southern Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 16,245,050. View filing ↗
  • Republic Services Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-24. CEO total compensation as printed in Republic Services Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 14,857,016. View filing ↗
  • Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-20. CEO total compensation as printed in Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 11,615,896. View filing ↗
  • Barrick Mining Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-10-01. CEO total compensation as printed in Barrick Mining Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 2,087,219. View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. reciprocity. DEF 14A. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. names Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, CSX Corporation reciprocity. DEF 14A. CSX Corporation names Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd/CN in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
Get the full report — $299