CompBrief BY VELARION

Companies Ingredion Inc

Ingredion (INGR): executive pay, fiscal 2025

Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.

Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →

Email me Ingredion Inc’s executive pay brief as a PDF

You get it on this page the moment you ask, and a copy by email. Every figure is cited to its filing.

After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.

Also free: The Pay Desk, the weekly executive pay briefing.
CEO total pay$12,932,234CEO James Zallie · source
Say-on-pay support96.43%Latest vote · source
CEO vs. named peers17th pct.Of 5 peer CEOs
CEO pay ratio226:1To the median employee · source

CEO pay, last three years

  • $11,101,992FY2023
  • $11,903,681FY2024
  • $12,932,234FY2025

CEO total pay was $12,932,234 in fiscal 2025, up from $11,903,681 in fiscal 2024.

FY2025: salary $1,290,929 · bonus $0 · stock awards $6,509,237 · option awards $1,999,964

Executives and directors

Frequently asked questions

Who was the highest-paid executive at Ingredion Inc in fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, James Zallie (Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer) was the highest-paid executive at Ingredion Inc in fiscal 2025, with total compensation of $12,932,234.
How does Ingredion Inc's chief executive pay compare to its disclosed peer group?
As disclosed, James Zallie's total compensation ranked at the 17th percentile of Ingredion Inc's disclosed peer group.
What is Ingredion Inc's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio?
As disclosed, Ingredion Inc's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio was 226:1.
How did shareholders vote on Ingredion Inc's executive compensation?
As disclosed, 96.43% of shareholders supported Ingredion Inc's executive compensation in the latest say-on-pay vote.
How much does Ingredion Inc spend in total on board compensation for fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, Ingredion Inc reported total board compensation of $2,896,951 for fiscal 2025.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Full detail

Every table from the filing. Open any section.

Summary compensation table
Named executive officerSalaryBonusStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentivePension / NQDCAll otherTotal
James Zallie$1,290,929$0$6,509,237$1,999,964$2,185,980$665,369$280,755$12,932,234
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
James Gray759,77301,464,555450,006871,060102,616128,7443,776,754
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert Ritchie556,8770976,409299,993487,930125,776160,1062,607,091
Executive Vice President, Food & Industrial Ingredients, US/Canada & Latin America and Sugar Reduction
Tanya Jaeger de Foras536,9370772,995237,493456,4625,228135,4092,144,524
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer
Eric Seip559,8120671,288206,243463,20315,646138,0042,054,196
Senior Vice President, Global Operations, and Chief Supply Chain Officer

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Named executive officerFY2025 totalFY2024 totalFY2023 totalΔ FY2024→2025
James Zallie$12,932,234$11,903,681$11,101,992↑ +1,028,553
James Gray3,776,7543,716,7443,157,018↑ +60,010
Robert Ritchie2,607,0912,166,073—↑ +441,018
Tanya Jaeger de Foras2,144,5242,128,911—↑ +15,613
Eric Seip2,054,1962,070,8821,889,929↓ −16,686

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The compensation program is designed to attract and retain high-quality talent, provide fair compensation commensurate with the work required, and align directors' and executives' interests with the interests of stockholders.

CEO STI target (% of salary)150%
CEO LTI target (% of salary)—
Independent consultantMeridian
Clawback policytrue
Anti-hedging—
Anti-pledging—
Equity grants and outstanding awards

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2025

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU2025-02-26——1,832—$239,204
James ZallieOPTION2025-02-26——59,647—1,999,964
Tanya Jaeger de ForasOPTION2025-02-26——7,083—237,493
James GrayOPTION2025-02-26——13,421—450,006

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Named executive officerTime-vested (RSU)Performance-vested (PSU)Options / SARs% performance-vested
Tanya Jaeger de Foras$239,204$0$237,4930.0%
James Zallie001,999,9640.0%
James Gray00450,0060.0%

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2025

ExecutiveAwardShares unvestedExercise priceMarket value unvested
Robert RitchieRSU706—$77,797
Robert RitchieOption92898.69—
Eric SeipRSU1,621—178,762
Robert RitchieRSU1,866—205,769
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU1,867—205,840
Eric SeipRSU1,911—210,742
Eric SeipRSU1,930—212,756
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU2,063—227,462
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU2,151—237,128
Robert RitchieRSU2,280—251,396
Eric SeipOption2,53898.69—
Tanya Jaeger de ForasOption2,71398.69—
Robert RitchieRSU3,077—339,228
Eric SeipRSU3,181—350,737
James GrayRSU3,390—373,785
Robert RitchieRSU3,658—403,331
Eric SeipRSU3,658—403,331
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU3,663—403,882
James GrayRSU3,794—418,278
James GrayRSU3,850—424,448
Tanya Jaeger de ForasRSU4,115—453,720
Robert RitchieRSU4,627—510,173
James GrayOption4,98998.69—
Robert RitchieOption5,064108.38—
Eric SeipOption5,064108.38—
Tanya Jaeger de ForasOption5,697108.38—
Eric SeipOption6,151130.57—
James GrayRSU6,941—765,315
Tanya Jaeger de ForasOption7,083130.57—
James GrayRSU7,545—831,912
Robert RitchieOption8,947130.57—
James GrayOption10,445108.38—
James GrayOption13,421130.57—
James ZallieRSU15,083—1,663,106
James ZallieRSU15,865—1,749,319
James ZallieRSU17,035—1,878,277
James ZallieOption22,40598.69—
James ZallieRSU30,848—3,401,300
James ZallieRSU31,093—3,428,314
James ZallieOption43,043108.38—
James ZallieOption59,647130.57—
Director compensation
DirectorCash feesStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveAll otherTotal
Gregory B. KennyIndependent · CGN (Chair) · Departed during FY$280,000$159,690——$0$439,690
Victoria J. ReichIndependent · Lead Independent Director · Audit130,000159,690——7,500297,190
Rhonda L. JordanIndependent · Compensation (Chair) · PCC (Chair) · CGN125,000159,690——8,500293,190
Patricia VerduinIndependent · Corporate Governance · Nominating105,000159,690——8,500273,190
David B. FischerIndependent · Compensation105,000159,690——3,551268,241
Catherine A. SueverIndependent · Audit105,000159,690——2,000266,690
Jorge A. UribeIndependent · Corporate Governance and Nominating105,000159,690——0264,690
Charles V. MagroIndependent · Compensation105,000159,690——0264,690
Stephan B. TandaIndependent · Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair)105,000159,690——0264,690
Dwayne A. WilsonIndependent · Audit105,000159,690——0264,690
James ZallieEmployee director · Board Chair—————0
Siobhán TalbotIndependent · Partial-year service · Newly elected——————

Board fee structure and ownership guideline

Annual cash retainer$105,000
Annual equity retainer$160,000
Per board meeting fee—
Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov)25,000 / 20,000 / 15,000
Stock ownership guideline$5

Total cost of the board

ComponentFY2025
Cash retainers and fees$1,270,000
Equity awards (grant-date value)$1,596,900
All other compensation$30,051
Total cost of the board$2,896,951

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

Peer group, and who names Ingredion as a peer

Companies that benchmark against INGR

11 companies name INGR as a compensation peer

Each company listed discloses INGR in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named INGR in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.

Disclosed peer group — fiscal year 2025

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Peer reciprocity

The companies Ingredion Inc names as compensation peers that name it back in their own disclosed peer groups.

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
1Eastman Chemical Company2025Mark Costa$1,406,958$12,682,200$3,278,151$987,000$19,498,966
2Bunge Global SA2025Gregory Heckman1,400,00012,767,72204,112,64018,945,479
3Corteva, Inc.2025Charles Magro1,405,3859,320,0782,330,0233,990,00017,499,399
4International Flavors2025J. Erik Fyrwald1,026,25011,656,76402,047,23015,002,866
5Ingredion Inc2025James Zallie1,290,9296,509,2371,999,9642,185,98012,932,234
6FMC Corporation2025Pierre Brondeau1,334,1256,257,9192,373,4201,798,26112,038,391

Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Incentive design against the same peers

CompanyAnnual incentive payoutLong-term vehicle mixPSU measures include TSRCompensation consultant
Ingredion Inc112.5%PSU 50 · RSU 25 · Options 25Yes — Relative Total Shareholder Return (rTSR)Meridian
Bunge Global SAnot disclosedPBRSU 60 · TBRSU 40Yes — 3-Year RTSRSemler Brossy
Corteva, Inc.190.0%PSU 60 · Option 20 · RSU 20NoFrederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.
Eastman Chemical Company47%PSA 60 · Option 20 · RSU 20Yes — Relative total shareholder return (rTSR)Aon plc
FMC Corporationnot disclosednot disclosedYesAon
International Flavors98.9%PSU 60 · RSU 40Yes — Relative TSR vs. S&P 500 - ChemicalsFW Cook

Read from each company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company’s filing does not state the item.

Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20262026-05-2049,179,0381,822,987100,03696.43%Passed
20252025-05-2150,840,1642,679,283323,24094.99%Passed
20242024-05-1550,326,7513,376,308327,87693.71%Passed
20232023-05-1952,112,3722,328,169135,37895.72%Passed
20222022-05-2052,852,0442,273,252143,15895.88%Passed
20212021-05-1952,239,2412,828,680137,21594.86%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company’s computation
20262026-05-2096.43%a
20252025-05-2194.99%b
20242024-05-1593.71%c

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “How many votes are required for the approval of each proposal and what is the effect of abstentions? A summary of our 2026 annual meeting proposals and applicable vote standards is as follows: Proposal Voting Options Vote Required for Approval Effect of an Abstention Election of Directors FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of the votes cast None -- does not count as a vote cast on this proposal Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of voting power of shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote thereat Treated as a vote AGAINST Ratification of Appointment of KPMG as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of voting power of shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote thereat Treated as a vote AGAINST What is the effect of broker non-votes? Under NYSE rules, if you hold your shares through a record holder such as a broker, the broker will not be able to vote your shares on Proposal 1 (election of directors) or Proposal 2 (advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement) unless it receives specific instructions from you.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “How many votes are required for the approval of each proposal and what is the effect of abstentions? A summary of our 2025 annual meeting proposals and applicable vote standards is as follows: Proposal Voting Options Vote Required for Approval Effect of an Abstention Election of Directors FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of the votes cast None: Does not count as a vote cast on this proposal Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of voting power of shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote thereat Treated as a vote AGAINST Ratification of Appointment of KPMG as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FOR, AGAINST, ABSTAIN Majority of voting power of shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote thereat Treated as a vote AGAINST What is the effect of broker non-votes? Under NYSE rules, if you hold your shares through a record holder of your shares such as a broker, the broker will not be able to vote your shares on Proposal 1 (election of directors) or Proposal 2 (advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement) unless it receives specific instructions from you.”.

c. Voting standard not stated in the filing.

Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

CEO pay ratio

Ratio (CEO : median employee)226 : 1
CEO total compensation$12,932,234
Median employee compensation$57,174
Insider trades since the proxy

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

Sources (36 citations)

Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

  • Section 01, James Zallie. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Summary Compensation Table” · page 47. As printed: 12,932,234. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, James Gray. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Summary Compensation Table” · page 47. As printed: 3,776,754. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Robert Ritchie. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Summary Compensation Table” · page 47. As printed: 2,607,091. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Tanya Jaeger de Foras. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Summary Compensation Table” · page 47. As printed: 2,144,524. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Eric Seip. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Summary Compensation Table” · page 47. As printed: 2,054,196. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Tanya Jaeger de Foras RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, James Zallie OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Tanya Jaeger de Foras OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, James Gray OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 07, pay ratio. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: 226 : 1. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Gregory B. Kenny. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 439,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Victoria J. Reich. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 297,190. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Rhonda L. Jordan. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 293,190. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Patricia Verduin. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 273,190. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, David B. Fischer. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 268,241. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Catherine A. Suever. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 266,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Jorge A. Uribe. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 264,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Charles V. Magro. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 264,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Stephan B. Tanda. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 264,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Dwayne A. Wilson. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 264,690. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, James Zallie. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. View filing ↗
  • Section 08, Siobhán Talbot. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: —. View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2026 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2026-05-21. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 96.43% (votes for as printed: 49,179,038). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-05-23. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 94.99% (votes for as printed: 50,840,164). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-05-16. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 93.71% (votes for as printed: 50,326,751). View filing ↗
  • Section 01 trend, Δ column (computed). Computed. Δ = current-FY total − prior-FY total per named officer.
  • Section 03b vehicle mix (computed). Computed. RSU / PSU / Options grant-date fair values summed per officer from the grants table; % performance-vested = PSU ÷ (RSU+PSU+Options).
  • Section 09b board cost (computed). Computed. Cash 1,270,000 + equity 1,596,900 + all other 30,051 = 2,896,951, summed across the director compensation table rows.
  • Eastman Chemical Company, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-24. CEO total compensation as printed in Eastman Chemical Company's own proxy. As printed: 19,498,966. View filing ↗
  • Bunge Global SA, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-10. CEO total compensation as printed in Bunge Global SA's own proxy. As printed: 18,945,479. View filing ↗
  • Corteva, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-19. CEO total compensation as printed in Corteva, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 17,499,399. View filing ↗
  • International Flavors, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-18. CEO total compensation as printed in International Flavors's own proxy. As printed: 15,002,866. View filing ↗
  • Ingredion Inc (subject), Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. CEO total compensation as printed in Ingredion Inc's own proxy. As printed: 12,932,234. View filing ↗
  • FMC Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-13. CEO total compensation as printed in FMC Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 12,038,391. View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, FMC Corporation reciprocity. DEF 14A. FMC Corporation names Ingredion Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, International Flavors reciprocity. DEF 14A. International Flavors names Ingredion Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
Get the full report — $500