PJT Partners Inc. (PJT)

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Every insider equity transaction reported on Form 4 after the 2025 proxy statement — acquisitions, dispositions, exercises, and withholdings — and therefore not reflected in any table in that document.

Transaction codes per Form 4: A acquisition · S open-market sale · F tax withholding · M option exercise · G gift. Value = shares × price as reported. Dividend-equivalent and fractional-share accrual rows (derivative Class A, under $10,000 and under 2,000 shares) are aggregated per date; every row appears in full below.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Our Compensation Committee believes that appropriate compensation for a particular executive should be made based on the full review of company and individual performance, while also considering market data.

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “77 General Information about Our 2026 Annual Meeting Required Votes Proposal 1: Elect the Class II Director Nominees Identified in this Proxy Statement Proposal 2: Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Ratify the Selection of Deloitte as Our Independent Registered Accounting Firm for 2026 How many votes are required for approval? > A plurality of votes cast, even if less than a majority > A majority of votes cast > A majority of votes cast How are director withhold votes treated? > Withhold votes will be excluded entirely from the vote with respect to the nominee from which they are withheld and will have no effect on this proposal > N/A > N/A How are abstentions treated? > N/A > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal How are broker non-votes treated? > Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but are not counted as votes cast and will have”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “71 G ENERAL I NFORMATION Required Votes Proposal 1: Elect the Two Class I Director Nominees Identified in this Proxy Statement Proposal 2: Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Ratify the Selection of Deloitte as Our Independent Registered Accounting Firm for 2025 How many votes are required for approval? > A plurality of votes cast, even if less than a majority > A majority of votes cast > A majority of votes cast How are director withhold votes treated? > Withhold votes will be excluded entirely from the vote with respect to the nominee from which they are withheld and will have no effect on this proposal > N/A > N/A How are abstentions treated? > N/A > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal How are broker non- votes treated? > Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal > Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of establishing”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “72 General Information TABLE OF CONTENTS ​ ​ Required Votes ​ ​ Proposal 1:Elect the Three Class III Director Nominees Identified in this Proxy Statement ​ ​ Proposal 2: Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation ​ ​ Proposal 3: Advisory Resolution on the Frequency of Future Advisory Resolutions to Approve Executive Compensation ​ ​ Proposal 4: Advisory Vote to Ratify the Selection of Deloitte as Our Independent Registered Accounting Firm for 2024 How many votes are required for approval? ​ ​ > A plurality of votes cast, even if less than a majority ​ ​ > A majority of votes cast ​ ​ > A majority of votes cast ​ ​ > A majority of votes cast How are director withhold votes treated? ​ ​ > Withhold votes will be excluded entirely from the vote with respect to the nominee from which they are withheld and will have no effect on this proposal ​ ​ > N/A ​ ​ > N/A ​ ​ > N/A How are abstentions treated? ​ ​ > N/A ​ ​ > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on this proposal ​ ​ > Abstentions are counted for the purpose of establishing th”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Of the companies PJT Partners Inc. names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer's own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer's filing. A dash means the peer's current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including PJT Partners Inc..

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Read from each company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company's filing does not state the item.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.