Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Every insider equity transaction reported on Form 4 after the 2025 proxy statement — acquisitions, dispositions, exercises, and withholdings — and therefore not reflected in any table in that document.

Transaction codes per Form 4: A acquisition · S open-market sale · F tax withholding · M option exercise · G gift. Value = shares × price as reported. Dividend-equivalent and fractional-share accrual rows (derivative Class A, under $10,000 and under 2,000 shares) are aggregated per date; every row appears in full below.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Our executive compensation program is a crucial driver of success, designed to attract, incentivize, and retain talented leaders essential for competing in a highly competitive environment. By aligning our short-term and long-term incentive compensation with both company objectives and stockholder interests, we promote a long-term focus that motivates and rewards our senior executive team for achieving near-term objectives and creating lasting value.

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

a. Voting standard not stated in the filing.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Effect of Proposal Board Recommendation Required Vote Withholding / Abstentions Broker Non-Votes 1 Election of directors "FOR" each nominee Plurality of votes cast (nominees that receive the most FOR votes will be elected) 1 No effect Not counted as a vote cast and so no effect 2 Non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers "FOR" Majority of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter Same as a vote AGAINST Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect 3 Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young "FOR" Majority of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter Same as a vote AGAINST Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect 4 Approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation "FOR" Two-thirds of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter Same as a vote AGAINST Same as a vote AGAINST 1 In accordance with our director resignation policy, any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of "withhold/abstention" votes than "for" votes is expected to tender their resignation for consideration by the Board.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Effect of Proposal Board Recommendation Required Vote Withholding / Abstentions Broker Non-Votes 1 Election of directors "FOR" each nominee Plurality of votes cast (nominees that receive the most FOR votes will be elected) No effect Not counted as a vote cast and so no effect 2 Non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers "FOR" Majority of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter Same as a vote AGAINST Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect 3 Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young "FOR" Majority of the voting power of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter Same as a vote AGAINST Not counted as entitled to vote and so no effect Each nominee has consented to be a candidate and to serve if elected.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Of the companies Pinterest, Inc. names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer's own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer's filing. A dash means the peer's current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including Pinterest, Inc..

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Read from each company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company's filing does not state the item.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.