Companies Nu Skin Enterprises
Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS): executive pay, fiscal 2025
Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.
Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →Email me Nu Skin Enterprises’s executive pay brief as a PDF
You get it on this page the moment you ask, and a copy by email. Every figure is cited to its filing.
After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.
CEO vs. named peers25th pct.Of 13 peer CEOs
CEO pay, last three years
- $5,838,579FY2023
- $5,993,088FY2024
- $5,965,206FY2025
CEO total pay was $5,965,206 in fiscal 2025, down from $5,993,088 in fiscal 2024.
FY2025: salary $1,008,082 · bonus $0 · stock awards $4,616,823 · option awards $0
Executives and directors
James Thomas · CFOJustin Keisel · EVPChayce Clark · General CounselRyan Napierski · CEOSteven Hatchett · EVP and Chief Product OfficerDaniel W. Campbell · Lead Independent DirectorEdwina D. Woodbury · Independent DirectorEmma S. Battle · Independent DirectorJames M. Winett · Independent DirectorLaura Nathanson · Independent DirectorMark A. Zorko · Independent DirectorSteven J. Lund · Chair of the BoardThomas R. Pisano · Independent Director
Frequently asked questions
Who was the highest-paid executive at Nu Skin Enterprises in fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, Ryan Napierski (President and Chief Executive Officer) was the highest-paid executive at Nu Skin Enterprises in fiscal 2025, with total compensation of $5,965,206.
How does Nu Skin Enterprises's chief executive pay compare to its disclosed peer group?
As disclosed, Ryan Napierski's total compensation ranked at the 25th percentile of Nu Skin Enterprises's disclosed peer group.
What is Nu Skin Enterprises's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio?
As disclosed, Nu Skin Enterprises's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio was 8853:1.
How did shareholders vote on Nu Skin Enterprises's executive compensation?
As disclosed, 96.35% of shareholders supported Nu Skin Enterprises's executive compensation in the latest say-on-pay vote.
How much does Nu Skin Enterprises spend in total on board compensation for fiscal 2025?
As disclosed, Nu Skin Enterprises reported total board compensation of $2,601,348 for fiscal 2025.
Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.
Full detail
Every table from the filing. Open any section.
Summary compensation table
| Named executive officer | Salary | Bonus | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | Pension / NQDC | All other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Napierski | $1,008,082 | $0 | $4,616,823 | $0 | $219,250 | $0 | $121,050 | $5,965,206 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
| Chayce Clark | 584,041 | 0 | 1,683,225 | 0 | 95,374 | 0 | 89,595 | 2,452,235 |
| EVP and General Counsel | ||||||||
| James Thomas | 491,616 | 0 | 1,058,030 | 0 | 80,574 | 0 | 77,782 | 1,708,003 |
| Former EVP and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||
| Steven Hatchett | 431,616 | 0 | 961,851 | 0 | 70,708 | 0 | 49,559 | 1,513,735 |
| EVP and Chief Product Officer | ||||||||
| Justin Keisel | 440,589 | 0 | 769,478 | 0 | 76,463 | 0 | 57,921 | 1,344,451 |
| EVP and President of Global Sales | ||||||||
A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.
Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive
| Named executive officer | FY2025 total | FY2024 total | FY2023 total | Δ FY2024→2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Napierski | $5,965,206 | $5,993,088 | $5,838,579 | ↓ −27,882 |
| Chayce Clark | 2,452,235 | 3,463,389 | 2,275,814 | ↓ −1,011,154 |
| James Thomas | 1,708,003 | 2,512,856 | 1,855,040 | ↓ −804,853 |
| Steven Hatchett | 1,513,735 | 1,599,389 | 1,414,890 | ↓ −85,654 |
| Justin Keisel | 1,344,451 | 973,617 | — | ↑ +370,834 |
Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.
Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis
The primary objectives of the executive compensation program are to motivate executives to perform at their highest capability, drive superior stockholder value over the long term, align the financial interests of executives with those of stockholders, and successfully recruit, motivate, and retain experienced and talented executives through competitive compensation arrangements tied to corporate and individual performance.
| CEO STI target (% of salary) | — |
|---|---|
| CEO LTI target (% of salary) | — |
| Independent consultant | Semler Brossy |
| Clawback policy | true |
| Anti-hedging | true |
| Anti-pledging | true |
Equity grants and outstanding awards
Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2025
| Executive | Award | Grant date | Threshold | Target | Granted | Maximum | Grant-date fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chayce Clark | PSU | 2025-02-26 | 28,299 | 113,196 | — | 226,392 | $847,838 |
| Steven Hatchett | RSU | 2025-02-26 | — | — | 64,684 | — | 477,368 |
| Justin Keisel | RSU | 2025-02-26 | — | — | 51,747 | — | 381,893 |
| Ryan Napierski | PSU | 2025-02-26 | 77,620 | 310,479 | — | 620,958 | 2,325,488 |
| James Thomas | PSU | 2025-02-26 | 17,788 | 71,152 | — | 142,304 | 532,929 |
| Steven Hatchett | PSU | 2025-02-26 | 16,171 | 64,684 | — | 129,368 | 484,483 |
| Ryan Napierski | RSU | 2025-02-26 | — | — | 310,479 | — | 2,291,335 |
| Justin Keisel | PSU | 2025-02-26 | 12,937 | 51,747 | — | 103,494 | 387,585 |
| James Thomas | RSU | 2025-02-26 | — | — | 71,152 | — | 525,102 |
| Chayce Clark | RSU | 2025-02-26 | — | — | 113,196 | — | 835,386 |
Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type
| Named executive officer | Time-vested (RSU) | Performance-vested (PSU) | Options / SARs | % performance-vested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chayce Clark | $835,386 | $847,838 | $0 | 50.4% |
| Steven Hatchett | 477,368 | 484,483 | 0 | 50.4% |
| Justin Keisel | 381,893 | 387,585 | 0 | 50.4% |
| Ryan Napierski | 2,291,335 | 2,325,488 | 0 | 50.4% |
| James Thomas | 525,102 | 532,929 | 0 | 50.4% |
% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.
Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2025
| Executive | Award | Shares unvested | Exercise price | Market value unvested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Keisel | PSU | 257 | — | $2,468 |
| James Thomas | PSU | 290 | — | 2,785 |
| James Thomas | PSU | 694 | — | 6,676 |
| Justin Keisel | Option | 719 | 48.81 | — |
| Steven Hatchett | PSU | 871 | — | 8,381 |
| Chayce Clark | Option | 1,431 | 48.81 | — |
| Steven Hatchett | RSU | 1,475 | — | 14,190 |
| Chayce Clark | PSU | 1,538 | — | 14,791 |
| Justin Keisel | RSU | 1,853 | — | 17,826 |
| Chayce Clark | RSU | 2,107 | — | 20,269 |
| James Thomas | RSU | 2,139 | — | 20,577 |
| James Thomas | Option | 2,710 | 48.81 | — |
| Chayce Clark | Option | 3,118 | 53.69 | — |
| James Thomas | RSU | 4,164 | — | 40,058 |
| Ryan Napierski | PSU | 4,510 | — | 43,389 |
| James Thomas | RSU | 4,664 | — | 44,868 |
| Steven Hatchett | Option | 4,879 | 48.81 | — |
| Steven Hatchett | RSU | 5,125 | — | 49,303 |
| Steven Hatchett | Option | 5,602 | 30.45 | — |
| Justin Keisel | RSU | 6,062 | — | 58,316 |
| Chayce Clark | Option | 6,739 | 30.45 | — |
| Ryan Napierski | RSU | 7,903 | — | 76,027 |
| Justin Keisel | PSU | 8,557 | — | 82,318 |
| Justin Keisel | Option | 9,031 | 30.45 | — |
| Chayce Clark | RSU | 9,044 | — | 87,003 |
| James Thomas | Option | 13,821 | 30.45 | — |
| Justin Keisel | RSU | 14,441 | — | 138,922 |
| Ryan Napierski | Option | 21,883 | 48.81 | — |
| Steven Hatchett | PSU | 26,329 | — | 253,285 |
| Ryan Napierski | RSU | 26,532 | — | 255,238 |
| James Thomas | PSU | 28,962 | — | 278,614 |
| Steven Hatchett | RSU | 29,622 | — | 284,964 |
| James Thomas | RSU | 32,583 | — | 313,448 |
| Chayce Clark | PSU | 46,077 | — | 443,261 |
| Justin Keisel | RSU | 51,747 | — | 497,806 |
| Chayce Clark | RSU | 51,837 | — | 498,672 |
| Steven Hatchett | RSU | 64,684 | — | 622,260 |
| James Thomas | RSU | 71,152 | — | 684,482 |
| Justin Keisel | PSU | 103,494 | — | 995,612 |
| Chayce Clark | RSU | 113,196 | — | 1,088,946 |
| Ryan Napierski | PSU | 126,382 | — | 1,215,795 |
| Steven Hatchett | PSU | 129,368 | — | 1,244,520 |
| Ryan Napierski | RSU | 142,181 | — | 1,367,781 |
| James Thomas | PSU | 142,304 | — | 1,368,964 |
| Ryan Napierski | Option | 178,831 | 30.45 | — |
| Chayce Clark | PSU | 226,392 | — | 2,177,891 |
| Ryan Napierski | RSU | 310,479 | — | 2,986,808 |
| Ryan Napierski | PSU | 620,958 | — | 5,973,616 |
Director compensation
| Director | Cash fees | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | All other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven J. LundEmployee director · Board Chair | — | — | — | — | $748,700 | $748,700 |
| Daniel W. CampbellIndependent · Lead Independent Director · Audit · Compensation and Human Capital | 140,500 | 145,865 | — | — | 27,992 | 314,357 |
| Mark A. ZorkoIndependent · Compensation and Human Capital · Nominating and Corporate Governance | 115,500 | 145,865 | — | — | 16,079 | 277,444 |
| Edwina D. WoodburyIndependent · Audit (Chair) · Nominating and Corporate Governance | 125,000 | 145,865 | — | — | 272 | 271,137 |
| Laura NathansonIndependent · Compensation and Human Capital · Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) | 120,000 | 145,865 | — | — | — | 265,865 |
| Emma S. BattleIndependent · Compensation and Human Capital (Chair) · Nominating and Corporate Governance | 120,000 | 145,865 | — | — | — | 265,865 |
| Thomas R. PisanoIndependent · Audit · Compensation and Human Capital | 105,000 | 145,865 | — | — | — | 250,865 |
| James M. WinettIndependent · Audit · Nominating and Corporate Governance | 61,250 | 145,865 | — | — | — | 207,115 |
| Ryan S. NapierskiEmployee director | — | — | — | — | — | 0 |
Board fee structure and ownership guideline
| Annual cash retainer | $85,000 |
|---|---|
| Annual equity retainer | $150,000 |
| Per board meeting fee | — |
| Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov) | 20,000 / 15,000 / 15,000 |
| Stock ownership guideline | — |
Total cost of the board
| Component | FY2025 |
|---|---|
| Cash retainers and fees | $787,250 |
| Equity awards (grant-date value) | $1,021,055 |
| All other compensation | $793,043 |
| Total cost of the board | $2,601,348 |
Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.
Peer group, and who names Nu Skin Enterprises as a peer
Companies that benchmark against NUS
11 companies name NUS as a compensation peer
- HELEN OF TROY LTDHELEFY2026
- HERBALIFE LTD.HLFFY2025
- Lifevantage CorpLFVNFY2026
- NEIGHBORHOOD INTELLIGENCE, INC.NXHFY2025
- OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC.OLPXFY2025
- PERRIGO Co plcPRGOFY2025
- Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.SBHFY2025
- SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COSMGFY2025
- SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPSXTFY2025
- Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.SPBFY2025
- USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INCUSNAFY2025
Each company listed discloses NUS in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named NUS in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.
Disclosed peer group — fiscal year 2025
The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.EPC Edgewell Personal Care CompanyHAIN The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.HLF Herbalife Ltd.SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.OLPX Olaplex Holdings, Inc.SONO Sonos, Inc.SBH Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.SXT Sensient Technologies CorporationHELE Helen of Troy LimitedPBH Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc.CRCT Cricut, Inc.USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc.
Peer reciprocity
The companies Nu Skin Enterprises names as compensation peers that name it back in their own disclosed peer groups.
Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC)45Herbalife Ltd. (HLF)46Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB)47Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH)48Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT)49Helen of Troy Limited (HELE)50USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA)51
Chief executive pay against the peer group
Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.
| Rank | Company | FY | Chief executive | Salary | Stock awards | Option awards | Non-equity incentive | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cricut, Inc. | 2025 | Ashish Arora | $530,250 | $5,465,250 | $0 | $806,131 | $13,441,923 |
| 2 | Edgewell Personal Care Company | 2025 | Rod Little | 1,100,000 | 7,576,100 | — | 907,500 | 9,754,366 |
| 3 | Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. | 2025 | Denise Paulonis | 1,229,231 | 6,000,116 | 0 | 1,868,432 | 9,112,619 |
| 4 | Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | 2025 | David Maura | 900,000 | 6,750,004 | 0 | 907,200 | 8,757,036 |
| 5 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 2025 | Paul Manning | 1,080,000 | 4,750,076 | 0 | 1,842,064 | 8,665,993 |
| 6 | Sonos, Inc. | 2025 | Tom Conrad | 1,258,654 | 6,073,193 | 0 | 146,416 | 8,275,354 |
| 7 | Herbalife Ltd. | 2025 | Stephan Gratziani | 930,385 | 2,799,996 | 1,399,998 | 1,411,650 | 7,384,841 |
| 8 | Olaplex Holdings, Inc. | 2025 | Amanda Baldwin | 1,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 0 | 515,000 | 6,541,537 |
| 9 | Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. | 2026 | Ronald Lombardi | 1,003,564 | 4,099,959 | 0 | 850,000 | 6,004,547 |
| 10 | Nu Skin Enterprises | 2025 | Ryan Napierski | 1,008,082 | 4,616,823 | 0 | 219,250 | 5,965,206 |
| 11 | The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. | 2025 | Wendy Davidson | 789,808 | 3,530,682 | 0 | 0 | 4,546,417 |
| 12 | Helen of Troy Limited | 2026 | G. Scott Uzzell | 550,000 | 3,250,000 | 0 | 107,752 | 4,433,124 |
| 13 | Usana Health Sciences, Inc. | 2025 | Jim Brown | 821,231 | 3,147,020 | 0 | 339,168 | 4,339,625 |
Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.
Incentive design against the same peers
| Company | Annual incentive payout | Long-term vehicle mix | PSU measures include TSR | Compensation consultant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nu Skin Enterprises | not disclosed | RSU 50 · PRSU 50 | not disclosed | Semler Brossy |
| Cricut, Inc. | not disclosed | not disclosed | not disclosed | not disclosed |
| Edgewell Personal Care Company | 66% | not disclosed | No | Meridian |
| Helen of Troy Limited | 16.3% | PRSU 60 · RSU 40 | No | FW Cook |
| Herbalife Ltd. | not disclosed | PSU 50 · SAR 25 · RCU 25 | not disclosed | Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC |
| Olaplex Holdings, Inc. | 103% | RSU 100 | not disclosed | Aon |
| Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. | 68% | PSU 75 · RSU 25 | No | not disclosed |
| Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. | 95% | PSU 50 · RSU 50 | Yes — rTSR | FW Cook |
| Sensient Technologies Corporation | not disclosed | PSU 60 · Restricted Stock 40 | not disclosed | Willis Towers Watson |
| Sonos, Inc. | 91.4% | PSU 50 · RSU 50 | Yes — Relative TSR | not disclosed |
| Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | not disclosed | PSU 70 · RSU 30 | No | WTW |
| The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. | not disclosed | RSU 50 · PSU 50 | Yes — Relative TSR versus the S&P Food & Beverage Select Industry Index | ClearBridge Compensation Group, LLC |
| Usana Health Sciences, Inc. | 14.6% of base salary for most NEOs; 41.3% for Jim Brown (CEO); 15% for Brent Neidig (whose bonus excluded the Hiya segment)% | not disclosed | Yes — Positive absolute Total Shareholder Return (TSR) | CODA |
Read from each company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company’s filing does not state the item.
Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
| Meeting year | Meeting date | For | Against | Abstain | Support | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026-05-28 | 33,111,458 | 1,255,101 | 37,082 | 96.35% | Passed |
| 2025 | 2025-05-29 | 30,210,716 | 825,311 | 1,422,147 | 97.34% | Passed |
| 2024 | 2024-06-05 | 36,992,257 | 1,415,374 | 25,860 | 96.31% | Passed |
| 2023 | 2023-06-07 | 42,369,023 | 507,952 | 31,446 | 98.82% | Passed |
| 2022 | 2022-06-02 | 40,463,786 | 396,630 | 152,674 | 99.03% | Passed |
| 2021 | 2021-06-02 | 37,874,262 | 430,676 | 328,987 | 98.88% | Passed |
Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.
Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation
| Meeting year | Meeting date | Approval — company’s computation |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026-05-28 | 96.35%a |
| 2025 | 2025-05-29 | 97.34%b |
| 2024 | 2024-06-05 | 96.31%c |
a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Shares not represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the determination of any of the proposals.”.
b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Shares not represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the determination of any of the proposals.”.
c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Shares not represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the determination of any of the proposals.”.
Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.
CEO pay ratio
| Ratio (CEO : median employee) | 8,853 : 1 |
|---|---|
| CEO total compensation | $5,965,206 |
| Median employee compensation | $674 |
Insider trades since the proxy
No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.
Sources (51 citations)
Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.
- Section 01, Ryan Napierski. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation Tables and Accompanying Narrative” · page 35. As printed: 5,965,206. View filing ↗
- Section 01, Chayce Clark. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation Tables and Accompanying Narrative” · page 35. As printed: 2,452,235. View filing ↗
- Section 01, James Thomas. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation Tables and Accompanying Narrative” · page 35. As printed: 1,708,003. View filing ↗
- Section 01, Steven Hatchett. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation Tables and Accompanying Narrative” · page 35. As printed: 1,513,735. View filing ↗
- Section 01, Justin Keisel. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation Tables and Accompanying Narrative” · page 35. As printed: 1,344,451. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Chayce Clark PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Steven Hatchett RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Justin Keisel RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Ryan Napierski PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, James Thomas PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Steven Hatchett PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Ryan Napierski RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Justin Keisel PSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, James Thomas RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 03, Chayce Clark RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Executive Compensation” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
- Section 07, pay ratio. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: 8853 : 1. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Steven J. Lund. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 748,700. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Daniel W. Campbell. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 314,357. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Mark A. Zorko. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 277,444. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Edwina D. Woodbury. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 271,137. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Laura Nathanson. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 265,865. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Emma S. Battle. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 265,865. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Thomas R. Pisano. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 250,865. View filing ↗
- Section 08, James M. Winett. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 207,115. View filing ↗
- Section 08, Ryan S. Napierski. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. Section “Director Compensation”. As printed: 0. View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2026 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2026-05-29. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 96.35% (votes for as printed: 33,111,458). View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-05-30. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 97.34% (votes for as printed: 30,210,716). View filing ↗
- Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-06-06. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 96.31% (votes for as printed: 36,992,257). View filing ↗
- Section 01 trend, Δ column (computed). Computed. Δ = current-FY total − prior-FY total per named officer.
- Section 03b vehicle mix (computed). Computed. RSU / PSU / Options grant-date fair values summed per officer from the grants table; % performance-vested = PSU ÷ (RSU+PSU+Options).
- Section 09b board cost (computed). Computed. Cash 787,250 + equity 1,021,055 + all other 793,043 = 2,601,348, summed across the director compensation table rows.
- Cricut, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-21. CEO total compensation as printed in Cricut, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 13,441,923. View filing ↗
- Edgewell Personal Care Company, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2025-12-22. CEO total compensation as printed in Edgewell Personal Care Company's own proxy. As printed: 9,754,366. View filing ↗
- Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2025-12-10. CEO total compensation as printed in Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 9,112,619. View filing ↗
- Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-06-26. CEO total compensation as printed in Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 8,757,036. View filing ↗
- Sensient Technologies Corporation, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-11. CEO total compensation as printed in Sensient Technologies Corporation's own proxy. As printed: 8,665,993. View filing ↗
- Sonos, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-01-22. CEO total compensation as printed in Sonos, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 8,275,354. View filing ↗
- Herbalife Ltd., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-17. CEO total compensation as printed in Herbalife Ltd.'s own proxy. As printed: 7,384,841. View filing ↗
- Olaplex Holdings, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-05-29. CEO total compensation as printed in Olaplex Holdings, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 6,541,537. View filing ↗
- Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-06-29. CEO total compensation as printed in Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 6,004,547. View filing ↗
- Nu Skin Enterprises (subject), Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. CEO total compensation as printed in Nu Skin Enterprises's own proxy. As printed: 5,965,206. View filing ↗
- The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2025-09-18. CEO total compensation as printed in The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 4,546,417. View filing ↗
- Helen of Troy Limited, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-06-24. CEO total compensation as printed in Helen of Troy Limited's own proxy. As printed: 4,433,124. View filing ↗
- Usana Health Sciences, Inc., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-07. CEO total compensation as printed in Usana Health Sciences, Inc.'s own proxy. As printed: 4,339,625. View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Edgewell Personal Care Company reciprocity. DEF 14A. Edgewell Personal Care Company names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Herbalife Ltd. reciprocity. DEF 14A. Herbalife Ltd. names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. reciprocity. DEF 14A. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reciprocity. DEF 14A. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Sensient Technologies Corporation reciprocity. DEF 14A. Sensient Technologies Corporation names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, Helen of Troy Limited reciprocity. DEF 14A. Helen of Troy Limited names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
- Section 10a, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. reciprocity. DEF 14A. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. names Nu Skin Enterprises in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗