RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ)

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Every insider equity transaction reported on Form 4 after the 2025 proxy statement — acquisitions, dispositions, exercises, and withholdings — and therefore not reflected in any table in that document.

Transaction codes per Form 4: A acquisition · S open-market sale · F tax withholding · M option exercise · G gift. Value = shares × price as reported. Dividend-equivalent and fractional-share accrual rows (derivative Class A, under $10,000 and under 2,000 shares) are aggregated per date; every row appears in full below.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

We believe that the primary goal of executive compensation is to align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders in a way that encourages prudent decision making and allows us to attract and retain the best executive talent.

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “​ HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED FOR THE PROPOSALS TO PASS? ​ The proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting have the following voting requirements: ​ Proposal ​ ​ Vote Required ​ ​ Abstentions ​ ​ Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed ​ ​ 1 ​ ​ Election of Trustees ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ No ​ ​ 2 ​ ​ Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ Yes ​ ​ 3 ​ ​ Non-binding Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ No ​ ​ 4 ​ ​ To approve the RLJ Lodging Trust 2026 Equity Incentive Plan ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ No ​ • Proposal 1 (Election of Trustees) As provided in our bylaws, to be elected in an uncontested election, trustee nominees must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, which means that the number of shares voted for a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted against that nominee.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “​ HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED FOR THE PROPOSALS TO PASS? ​ The proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting have the following voting requirements: ​ Proposal ​ ​ Vote Required ​ ​ Abstentions ​ ​ Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed ​ ​ 1 ​ ​ Election of Trustees ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ No ​ ​ 2 ​ ​ Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ Yes ​ ​ 3 ​ ​ Non-binding Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation ​ ​ Affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ No ​ • Proposal 1 (Election of Trustees) As provided in our bylaws, to be elected in an uncontested election, trustee nominees must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, which means that the number of shares voted for a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted against that nominee.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Of the companies RLJ Lodging Trust names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer's own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer's filing. A dash means the peer's current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including RLJ Lodging Trust.

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Read from each company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company's filing does not state the item.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.