Bristol Myers Squibb Co (BMY)

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Every insider equity transaction reported on Form 4 after the 2025 proxy statement — acquisitions, dispositions, exercises, and withholdings — and therefore not reflected in any table in that document.

Transaction codes per Form 4: A acquisition · S open-market sale · F tax withholding · M option exercise · G gift. Value = shares × price as reported. Dividend-equivalent and fractional-share accrual rows (derivative Class A, under $10,000 and under 2,000 shares) are aggregated per date; every row appears in full below.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

At Bristol Myers Squibb, the cornerstone of our compensation philosophy and program structure is aligning pay to the achievement of both our short-term and long-term goals, engagement of our employees, the achievement of our mission and the delivery of value to our shareholders.

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “The affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required for the approval of the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “How Will My Shares Be Voted at the Virtual Annual Meeting? Voting Options Item Proposal Voting Options Effect of Abstentions Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed? Effect of Broker Non-Votes 1 Election of Directors FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN (for each director nominee) No effect--not counted as a vote cast No No effect 2 Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN Treated as a vote AGAINST the proposal No No effect 3 Ratification of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN Treated as a vote AGAINST the proposal Yes Not applicable 4 Shareholder Proposal on Corporate Financial Sustainability FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN Treated as a vote AGAINST the proposal No No effect 5 Shareholder Proposal on a Request to Cease DEI Efforts FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN Treated as a vote AGAINST the proposal No No effect How Many Votes Are Needed to Elect the Directors and to Approve Each of the Proposals? Director Elections: A majority of votes cast with respect to each director's election at the meeting is required to elect each director.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast for or against the director and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Of the companies Bristol Myers Squibb Co names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer's own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer's filing. A dash means the peer's current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including Bristol Myers Squibb Co.

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Read from each company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company's filing does not state the item.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.