CompBrief BY VELARION

Companies Estee Lauder Companies Inc

Estee Lauder Companies (EL): executive pay, fiscal 2026

Free brief. Every figure links to the company’s own filing.

Velarion Intel: free for 3 days, no card →

Email me Estee Lauder Companies Inc’s executive pay brief as a PDF

You get it on this page the moment you ask, and a copy by email. Every figure is cited to its filing.

After the PDF, up to three short notes on the deeper reports for this company. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.

Also free: The Pay Desk, the weekly executive pay briefing.
CEO total pay$20,585,784CEO Stéphane Faverie · source
Say-on-pay support91.04%Latest vote · source
CEO vs. named peers57th pct.Of 14 peer CEOs
CEO pay ratio352:1To the median employee · source

CEO pay, last three years

  • $5,936,922FY2024
  • $9,613,508FY2025
  • $20,585,784FY2026

CEO total pay was $20,585,784 in fiscal 2026, up from $9,613,508 in fiscal 2025.

FY2026: salary $1,500,000 · bonus $0 · stock awards $8,396,680 · option awards $6,325,072

Executives and directors

Frequently asked questions

Who was the highest-paid executive at Estee Lauder Companies Inc in fiscal 2026?
As disclosed, Stéphane Faverie (President and Chief Executive Officer) was the highest-paid executive at Estee Lauder Companies Inc in fiscal 2026, with total compensation of $20,585,784.
How does Estee Lauder Companies Inc's chief executive pay compare to its disclosed peer group?
As disclosed, Stéphane Faverie's total compensation ranked at the 57th percentile of Estee Lauder Companies Inc's disclosed peer group.
What is Estee Lauder Companies Inc's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio?
As disclosed, Estee Lauder Companies Inc's CEO-to-median employee pay ratio was 352:1.
How did shareholders vote on Estee Lauder Companies Inc's executive compensation?
As disclosed, 91.04% of shareholders supported Estee Lauder Companies Inc's executive compensation in the latest say-on-pay vote.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Full detail

Every table from the filing. Open any section.

Summary compensation table
Named executive officerSalaryBonusStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentivePension / NQDCAll otherTotal
Stéphane Faverie$1,500,000$0$8,396,680$6,325,072$4,105,300$180,618$78,114$20,585,784
President and Chief Executive Officer
Jane Hudis1,344,00003,741,6472,818,4273,062,300274,72360,15911,301,256
Executive Vice President, Chief Brand Officer
Rashida Lande927,0001,000,0002,099,2391,581,2861,973,30012,30656,5327,649,663
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Roberto Canevari1,125,00001,977,4601,489,5311,759,55062,62760,7556,474,923
Executive Vice President, Chief Value Chain Officer
Akhil Shrivastava900,00001,546,6911,128,5951,403,00064,37864,2505,106,914
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Named executive officerFY2026 totalFY2025 totalFY2024 totalΔ FY2025→2026
Stéphane Faverie$20,585,784$9,613,508$5,936,922↑ +10,972,276
Jane Hudis11,301,2566,852,1467,214,795↑ +4,449,110
Rashida Lande7,649,66310,893,341—↓ −3,243,678
Roberto Canevari6,474,923———
Akhil Shrivastava5,106,9143,666,879—↑ +1,440,035

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

Incentive-plan design — the Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Our compensation program for executive officers is designed to attract and retain world class talent and to motivate achievement of both our short-term and long-term goals. We believe that the design and governance of our program supports, and aligns executive officers with the business strategy.

CEO STI target (% of salary)—
CEO LTI target (% of salary)—
Independent consultantSemler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC
Clawback policyTrue
Anti-hedgingTrue
Anti-pledgingFalse
Equity grants and outstanding awards

Grants of plan-based awards — fiscal year 2026

ExecutiveAwardGrant dateThresholdTargetGrantedMaximumGrant-date fair value
Stéphane FaverieRSU2025-08-28——45,948—$4,216,648
Jane HudisRSU2025-08-28——20,475—1,878,991
Jane HudisOPTION2025-08-28——78,727—2,818,427
Akhil ShrivastavaRSU2025-08-28——8,655—794,269
Stéphane FaverieRSU2025-08-28——45,549—4,180,032
Rashida LandeRSU2025-08-28——11,388—1,045,077
Roberto CanevariRSU2025-08-28——10,727—984,417
Roberto CanevariRSU2025-08-28——10,821—993,043
Jane HudisRSU2025-08-28——20,297—1,862,656
Rashida LandeRSU2025-08-28——11,487—1,054,162
Akhil ShrivastavaRSU2025-08-28——8,199—752,422
Stéphane FaverieOPTION2025-08-28——176,678—6,325,072
Roberto CanevariOPTION2025-08-28——41,607—1,489,531
Rashida LandeOPTION2025-08-28——44,170—1,581,286
Akhil ShrivastavaOPTION2025-08-28——31,525—1,128,595

Vehicle mix — grant-date fair value by award type

Named executive officerTime-vested (RSU)Performance-vested (PSU)Options / SARs% performance-vested
Stéphane Faverie$8,396,680$0$6,325,0720.0%
Jane Hudis3,741,64702,818,4270.0%
Akhil Shrivastava1,546,69101,128,5950.0%
Rashida Lande2,099,23901,581,2860.0%
Roberto Canevari1,977,46001,489,5310.0%

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end 2026

ExecutiveAwardShares unvestedExercise priceMarket value unvested
Akhil ShrivastavaPSU235—$19,144
Akhil ShrivastavaOption676156.39—
Roberto CanevariPSU1,499—126,965
Jane HudisPSU2,973—251,813
Roberto CanevariOption4,340156.39—
Roberto CanevariPSU4,582—375,999
Akhil ShrivastavaPSU4,910—402,915
Akhil ShrivastavaRSU5,265—428,583
Rashida LandePSU5,384—441,811
Roberto CanevariPSU6,109—501,305
Akhil ShrivastavaPSU6,598—537,057
Rashida LandePSU7,179—589,109
Akhil ShrivastavaRSU8,199—658,790
Jane HudisOption8,608156.39—
Akhil ShrivastavaRSU8,655—695,429
Jane HudisPSU8,931—732,878
Roberto CanevariOption9,47492.87—
Akhil ShrivastavaOption10,37792.87—
Roberto CanevariRSU10,727—861,914
Roberto CanevariRSU10,821—869,467
Rashida LandeOption11,12992.87—
Rashida LandeRSU11,388—915,026
Rashida LandeRSU11,487—922,980
Jane HudisPSU11,908—977,170
Jane HudisOption18,46492.87—
Jane HudisRSU20,297—1,630,864
Jane HudisRSU20,475—1,645,166
Rashida LandeRSU28,714—2,356,271
Akhil ShrivastavaOption31,52591.77—
Roberto CanevariOption41,60791.77—
Rashida LandeOption44,17091.77—
Jane HudisOption78,72791.77—
Director compensation

No director compensation table is on file for fiscal year 2026.

Board fee structure and ownership guideline

Annual cash retainer$100,000
Annual equity retainer$75,000
Per board meeting fee—
Committee chair fees (audit / comp / nom-gov)25,000 / 15,000 / 15,000
Stock ownership guideline$5
Peer group, and who names Estee Lauder Companies as a peer

Companies that benchmark against EL

21 companies name EL as a compensation peer

Each company listed discloses EL in its own benchmarking peer group, as disclosed in each company's most recent proxy statement within the last two proxy seasons. Two companies are therefore absent by design: one that named EL in an earlier year and no longer does, and one whose own most recent disclosure is older than the last two seasons.

Disclosed peer group — fiscal year 2026

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Peer reciprocity

Of the companies Estee Lauder Companies Inc names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer’s own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer’s filing. A dash means the peer’s current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including Estee Lauder Companies Inc.

Chief executive pay against the peer group

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company’s own proxy statement.

RankCompanyFYChief executiveSalaryStock awardsOption awardsNon-equity incentiveTotal
1Nike2026Elliott Hill$1,500,000$28,137,798$3,967,113$2,220,000$36,340,876
2Tapestry2026Joanne Crevoiserat1,440,38523,906,5362,750,2235,800,00033,986,485
3Coca-Cola2025James Quincey1,675,00012,516,10910,352,2555,025,00031,208,165
4Starbucks2025Brian Niccol1,599,99819,881,58501,971,00030,992,773
5Mondelez2025Dirk Van de Put1,624,61514,530,3594,401,5553,234,00024,516,114
6Lululemon2025Calvin McDonald1,393,2697,800,00113,800,030994,79424,023,294
7Estee Lauder Companies Inc2026Stéphane Faverie1,500,0008,396,6806,325,0724,105,30020,585,784
8Colgate-Palmolive2025Noel Wallace1,500,0008,005,1523,570,0162,455,95016,478,196
9PVH Corp.2025Stefan Larsson1,450,00012,200,530—2,142,23016,165,385
10Kimberly-Clark2025Michael Hsu1,500,00011,499,98901,596,42415,320,405
11International Flavors & Fragrances2025J. Erik Fyrwald1,026,25011,656,76402,047,23015,002,866
12Capri Holdings2026John Idol1,350,0004,999,99405,400,00011,909,990
13Coty2026Markus Strobel478,3586,720,0013,720,000011,088,860
14Kenvue2025Kirk Perry566,3462,691,6832,509,60707,494,081
15Bath & Body Works2025Daniel Heaf913,8465,043,7710358,9536,587,902

Each peer’s compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer’s figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Incentive design against the same peers

CompanyAnnual incentive payoutLong-term vehicle mixPSU measures include TSRCompensation consultant
Estee Lauder Companies Incnot disclosedOptions 60 · RSU 40not disclosedSemler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC
Bath & Body Works32.2%not disclosedYes — relative TSR assessed against the companies listed in the S&P Composite 1500 Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail IndexMeridian Compensation Partners, LLC
Capri Holdings200%RSU 100not disclosedWillis Towers Watson (WTW)
Coca-Cola150%PSU 50 · Options 50Yes — Relative TSR modifierMeridian Compensation Partners, LLC
Colgate-Palmolive93.6%PSU 50 · Options 30 · RSU 20NoFW Cook
Cotynot disclosednot disclosednot disclosedWillis Towers Watson
International Flavors & Fragrances98.9%PSU 60 · RSU 40Yes — Relative TSR vs. S&P 500 - ChemicalsFW Cook
Kenvue65.1%PSU 50 · Options 30 · RSU 20NoSemler Brossy
Kimberly-Clark61%PSU 60 · RSU 40NoSemler Brossy Consulting Group
Lululemon35.7%PSU 60 · RSU 20 · Options 20NoWTW (Willis Towers Watson)
Mondelez91%PSU 75 · Option 25Nonot disclosed
Nike74%PSU 50 · Option 25 · RSU 25Yes — Relative TSRnot disclosed
PVH Corp.73.87%PSU 50 · RSU 50Yes — relative TSRFrederic W. Cook & Co. (FW Cook)
Starbucksnot disclosedPRSU 60 · RSU 40Yes — Relative TSRPay Governance
Tapestrynot disclosedPSU 50 · Options 25 · RSU 25Yes — Relative TSRFW Cook

Read from each company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company’s filing does not state the item.

Say-on-pay history and pay ratio
Meeting yearMeeting dateForAgainstAbstainSupportOutcome
20252025-11-131,314,884,277129,353,712142,75291.04%Passed
20242024-11-081,318,895,95497,539,821458,29693.11%Passed
20242024-11-081,318,895,95497,539,821458,29693.11%Passed
20232023-11-171,318,781,590120,291,814572,89291.64%Passed
20222022-11-181,369,942,64477,110,054556,35394.67%Passed
20212021-11-121,336,491,469135,590,8481,636,35990.79%Passed

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year’s compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company’s computation

Meeting yearMeeting dateApproval — company’s computation
20252025-11-1391.04%a
20242024-11-0893.11%b
20242024-11-0893.11%c

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “What is the vote required to approve each proposal? ​ ​ Proposal ​ ​ Vote required for approval (Class A and Class B Common Stock, voting together) ​ ​ Effect of abstentions ​ ​ Effect of broker non-votes (c) ​ ​ ​ ​ Item 1: Election of five Class II Directors and one Class I Director ​ ​ Plurality of Votes Cast (a) ​ ​ Not applicable ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ Item 2: Ratify appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors ​ ​ Majority of Votes Cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ No effect (d) ​ ​ ​ ​ Item 3: Advisory vote to approve Executive Compensation ​ ​ Majority of Votes Cast (b) ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ ​ ​ Item 4: Approval of amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the monetary liability of certain officers as permitted by Delaware law and to make certain miscellaneous changes to Article IV thereof ​ ​ Majority of the voting power of shares outstanding ​ ​ Same as "against" vote ​ ​ Same as "against" vote ​ ​ ​ ​ Item 5: Approval of amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to make certain miscellaneous changes to Articles V and VI thereof ​ ​ At least 75% of te online by following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/EL2025 .”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation." ​ Broker non-votes and abstentions do not count as votes cast and therefore have no effect on vote outcomes.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation." ​ Broker non-votes and abstentions do not count as votes cast and therefore have no effect on vote outcomes.”.

Approval percentages are the company’s own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

CEO pay ratio

Ratio (CEO : median employee)352 : 1
CEO total compensation$13,422,486
Median employee compensation$38,149
Insider trades since the proxy

No insider equity transactions reported since the proxy statement.

Sources (50 citations)

Each figure is listed with the filing it comes from, where it appears in that filing, and the value as printed. Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

  • Section 01, Stéphane Faverie. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Summary Compensation Table” · page 66. As printed: 20,585,784. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Jane Hudis. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 11,301,256. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Rashida Lande. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 7,649,663. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Roberto Canevari. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 6,474,923. View filing ↗
  • Section 01, Akhil Shrivastava. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Summary Compensation Table”. As printed: 5,106,914. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Stéphane Faverie RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Jane Hudis RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Jane Hudis OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Akhil Shrivastava RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Stéphane Faverie RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Rashida Lande RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Roberto Canevari RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Roberto Canevari RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Jane Hudis RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Rashida Lande RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Akhil Shrivastava RSU. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Stéphane Faverie OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Roberto Canevari OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Rashida Lande OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 03, Akhil Shrivastava OPTION. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. Section “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2026” · grants of plan-based awards table. View filing ↗
  • Section 07, pay ratio. DEF 14A, filed 2025-09-25. Section “CEO Pay Ratio”. As printed: 352 : 1. View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2025 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2025-11-18. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 91.04% (votes for as printed: 1,314,884,277). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-11-13. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 93.11% (votes for as printed: 1,318,895,954). View filing ↗
  • Section 06, 2024 vote. Form 8-K, filed 2024-11-13. Item 5.07 · say-on-pay result. As reported: 93.11% (votes for as printed: 1,318,895,954). View filing ↗
  • Section 01 trend, Δ column (computed). Computed. Δ = current-FY total − prior-FY total per named officer.
  • Section 03b vehicle mix (computed). Computed. RSU / PSU / Options grant-date fair values summed per officer from the grants table; % performance-vested = PSU ÷ (RSU+PSU+Options).
  • Nike, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-07-15. CEO total compensation as printed in Nike's own proxy. As printed: 36,340,876. View filing ↗
  • Tapestry, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-25. CEO total compensation as printed in Tapestry's own proxy. As printed: 33,986,485. View filing ↗
  • Coca-Cola, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-16. CEO total compensation as printed in Coca-Cola's own proxy. As printed: 31,208,165. View filing ↗
  • Starbucks, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-01-26. CEO total compensation as printed in Starbucks's own proxy. As printed: 30,992,773. View filing ↗
  • Mondelez, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-03. CEO total compensation as printed in Mondelez's own proxy. As printed: 24,516,114. View filing ↗
  • Lululemon, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-05-18. CEO total compensation as printed in Lululemon's own proxy. As printed: 24,023,294. View filing ↗
  • Estee Lauder Companies Inc (subject), Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-09-30. CEO total compensation as printed in Estee Lauder Companies Inc's own proxy. As printed: 20,585,784. View filing ↗
  • Colgate-Palmolive, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-25. CEO total compensation as printed in Colgate-Palmolive's own proxy. As printed: 16,478,196. View filing ↗
  • PVH Corp., Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-05-08. CEO total compensation as printed in PVH Corp.'s own proxy. As printed: 16,165,385. View filing ↗
  • Kimberly-Clark, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-23. CEO total compensation as printed in Kimberly-Clark's own proxy. As printed: 15,320,405. View filing ↗
  • International Flavors & Fragrances, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-03-18. CEO total compensation as printed in International Flavors & Fragrances's own proxy. As printed: 15,002,866. View filing ↗
  • Capri Holdings, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-06-16. CEO total compensation as printed in Capri Holdings's own proxy. As printed: 11,909,990. View filing ↗
  • Coty, Section 10b CEO total. DEFR 14A, filed 2026-09-25. CEO total compensation as printed in Coty's own proxy. As printed: 11,088,860. View filing ↗
  • Kenvue, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-08. CEO total compensation as printed in Kenvue's own proxy. As printed: 7,494,081. View filing ↗
  • Bath & Body Works, Section 10b CEO total. DEF 14A, filed 2026-04-28. CEO total compensation as printed in Bath & Body Works's own proxy. As printed: 6,587,902. View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, International Flavors & Fragrances reciprocity. DEF 14A. International Flavors & Fragrances names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Coca-Cola reciprocity. DEF 14A. Coca-Cola's most recent proxy was read; its disclosed peer group does not include Estee Lauder Companies Inc. View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, PVH Corp. reciprocity. DEF 14A. PVH Corp. names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Coty reciprocity. DEF 14A. Coty names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Tapestry reciprocity. DEF 14A. Tapestry names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Starbucks reciprocity. DEF 14A. Starbucks names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Bath & Body Works reciprocity. DEF 14A. Bath & Body Works names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Mondelez reciprocity. DEF 14A. Mondelez names Estee Lauder Companies Inc in its own disclosed peer group (read from its most recent proxy). View filing ↗
  • Section 10a, Nike reciprocity. DEF 14A. Nike's most recent proxy was read; its disclosed peer group does not include Estee Lauder Companies Inc. View filing ↗
Get the full report — $500