Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG)

A dash means the company reported no figure in that column; 0 means it reported zero. Figures are as printed in the filing, without adjustment.

Three-year trend — total compensation per named executive

Prior-year totals as disclosed in the corresponding proxy; deltas are computed values with the derivation shown in the register.

You have just read Kite Realty Group Trust's Summary Compensation Table. The whole free brief as a PDF, emailed now, with every figure cited — then a few short notes on the deeper KRG reports.

We send the PDF right away, then up to three short notes. Reply “unsubscribe” to any of them, any time.

One page per officer: the same table above, read for one person at a time — his own figure and every fiscal year the register holds.

One page per director: the seat, the committees and the fee table, read for one person at a time.

Every insider equity transaction reported on Form 4 after the 2025 proxy statement — acquisitions, dispositions, exercises, and withholdings — and therefore not reflected in any table in that document.

Transaction codes per Form 4: A acquisition · S open-market sale · F tax withholding · M option exercise · G gift. Value = shares × price as reported. Dividend-equivalent and fractional-share accrual rows (derivative Class A, under $10,000 and under 2,000 shares) are aggregated per date; every row appears in full below.

% performance-vested = PSU grant-date fair value ÷ (RSU + PSU + Options), a computed value with the derivation shown in the register.

Our compensation program is designed to accomplish the following key objectives: Attract, retain, and motivate outstanding senior executives; Ensure that compensation remains competitive with the prevailing market using a pay-for-performance structure that rewards superior results that will enhance shareholder value over the long term; Use a balanced approach that rewards both short-term and long-term performance and does not incentivize excessive risk-taking; and Provide significant alignment with our shareholders interests.

Rows are labeled by annual-meeting year, with the meeting date beside each; the vote held in a given year acts on the prior fiscal year's compensation.

Say-on-pay — history, company's computation

a. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “g Options Board Recommendation Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal Effect of Abstentions Effect of Broker Non-Votes PROPOSAL 1: Election of Trustee For, Against or Abstain on each Nominee FOR each Nominee Majority of votes cast No effect No effect PROPOSAL 2: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation For, Against or Abstain FOR Majority of votes cast No effect No effect PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP For, Against or Abstain FOR Majority of votes cast No effect Brokers have discretion to vote A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does 40.78 HIGH-QUALITY OPEN-AIR PORTFOLIO All Company data is as of December 31, 2025 unless otherwise indicated 169 27M $153K Operating Properties Total Owned GLA (SF) Portfolio Average Household Income 1 Predominantly Sun Belt with Strategic Gateway Components ABR Concentration Sun Belt Markets 2 67% Top 10 Population Growth States 3 69% Strategic Gateway Markets (DC, Seattle, and NYC) 22% Top 5 States (Total Weighted ABR) Texas 28 % Florida 11% Indiana 7% Virginia 7% Maryland 6% 1.”.

b. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “Options Board Recommendation Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal Effect of Abstentions Effect of Broker Non-Votes PROPOSAL 1: Election of Trustees For, Against or Abstain on each Nominee FOR each Nominee Majority of votes cast No effect No effect PROPOSAL 2: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation For, Against or Abstain FOR Majority of votes cast No effect No effect PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP For, Against or Abstain FOR Majority of votes cast No effect Brokers have discretion to vote A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does CH NOMINEE See Page 4 PROPOSAL 2: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation FOR See Page 25 PROPOSAL 3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FOR See Page 52 This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the Proxy Statement.”.

c. Approved under the standard stated in the filing — “​ Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal ​ ​ Effect of Abstentions ​ ​ Effect of Broker Non-Votes Proposal 1: Election of Trustees ​ ​ For, Against or Abstain on each Nominee ​ ​ FOR each Nominee ​ ​ Majority of votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ No effect Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation ​ ​ For, Against or Abstain ​ ​ FOR ​ ​ Majority of votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ No effect Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP ​ ​ For, Against or Abstain ​ ​ FOR ​ ​ Majority of votes cast ​ ​ No effect ​ ​ Brokers have discretion to vote A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received voting instructions from th ntained elsewhere in the Proxy Statement.”.

Approval percentages are the company's own reported computations under its own stated standard, not recomputed by Velarion. Where a company does not state a standard, none is assumed.

Computed as the sum of the director compensation table rows above; inputs and formula shown in the register.

The compensation peer group as the company disclosed it in its own proxy — the reference set behind the percentile above.

Of the companies Kite Realty Group Trust names as compensation peers, which name it back in their own disclosed peer groups. A peer set the market reciprocates reads differently from one selected in a single direction.

Reciprocity shown where the peer's own current proxy has been read — each mark is cited in the register to that peer's filing. A dash means the peer's current proxy was read and names no reciprocal group including Kite Realty Group Trust.

Most recent fiscal-year chief executive compensation at each disclosed peer, taken from that company's own proxy statement.

Each peer's compensation is from its most recently filed proxy; fiscal years differ by company. Each peer's figures come from its own filings; the subject company is highlighted. Peers whose chief executive compensation is outside our coverage universe are stated as such, never left blank.

Read from each company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis: annual incentive payout as a percentage of target, the disclosed long-term vehicle mix, whether performance-share measures include a total shareholder return component, and the retained compensation consultant. “Not disclosed” appears only where the company's filing does not state the item.

Answers are drawn only from the figures disclosed in this brief and cited to their location in the source filing. Where a figure required for an answer is not disclosed, that is stated rather than estimated.

Each figure's location is given both for the eye (section · page · table · row · column) and for a script (table/row/column index and exact character span in the filed document). Any figure can be independently confirmed against the source.

The Pay Desk — the free weekly executive pay briefing, one company at a time, every number traceable to a public filing.

You'll confirm on The Pay Desk's sign-up page.